Digital welfare state: a digital transformation of social services

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18593/ejjl.30342

Keywords:

Social security, Digital transformation, Human rights

Abstract

The digitalisation of social services has been promoted in recent years by both international agencies and democratic governments. During the Covid-19 pandemic this trend, which was evolving at a moderate pace, grew rapidly to the point of creating, in less than two years, a new world for social services. This study presents a review of the current state of discussions involving social rights and the digital transformation in the forms of state provision. It firstly analyses a leading case ruled by the Dutch Court, secondly it discusses three technical reports issued by international bodies upon the definitive state of the digital welfare state from 2019 onwards. It argues that the social security system of no democracy will be able to resist the allure of digital transformations. There is a solid acceptance that capitalism has entered its digital era and it implies the duty of the state to provide society with such corresponding services in social domain.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Carlos Luiz Strapazzon

Pós-doutor em Direito (PUC-RS), Doutor em Direito (UFSC), Professor de Direito Constitucional e Direitos Fundamentais (Unoesc). Professor de Direito Constitucional, Universidade Positivo. Editor-Chefe da Espaço Jurídico Journal of Law [EJJL]

References

ALGORITHMWATCH. Automating Society: taking stock of automated decision-making in the EU, 2019. Disponível em: https//algorithmwatch org/en/automating-society/.

ALSTON, P. Digital welfare states and human rights. Report n. A/74/48037, October 11th, 2019. United Nations. Disponível em: https://www.ohchr.org/en/special-procedures/sr-poverty/annual-reports.

BALAGUER CALLEJÓN, F. The impact of the new mediators of the digital age on freedom of speech. In: YSEC Yearbook of Socio-Economic Constitutions. Springer, Cham, 2022. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1007/16495_2021_32. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/16495_2021_32

BALAGUER CALLEJÓN, F. L’impatto dei nuovi intermediari dell’era digitale sulla libertà di espressione. CITTADINANZA EUROPEA (LA), n1, 2021, 33-62. DOI: 10.3280/CEU2021-001002. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3280/CEU2021-001002

BATTAGLIN, M. F. L.; CARNEIRO, J. V. V. Problematizando o direito à privacidade e à proteção de dados pessoais em face da vigilância biométrica. Revista Teknokultura, Univ. Complutense de Madrid, V17, n2, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5209/tekn.69479

BEDUSCHI, A. Digital identity: contemporary challenges for data protection privacy and non-discrimination rights. Big Data & Society. v6, n2, 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951719855091

BEKKER, S. Fundamental rights in digital welfare states. The case of SyRI in the Netherlands. In Netherlands Yearbook of International Law 2019. TMC Asser Press. The Hague: 2021, p. 289-307. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6265-403-7_24

BROCK, G. The right to be forgotten: privacy and the media in the digital age. Bloomsbury Publishing, 2016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5040/9781350989207

BROMELL, D. Regulating free speech in a digital age hate harm and the limits of censorship. Springer, 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-95550-2

CHOROSZEWICZ, M.; MÄIHÄNIEMI, B. Developing a digital welfare state data protection and the use of automated decision-making in the public sector across six EU countries. Global Perspectives, UC Press, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1525/gp.2020.12910. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1525/gp.2020.12910

CHOULDECHOVA A. et. al., A case study of algorithm-assisted decision making in child maltreatment hotline screening decisions. Proceedings of Machine Learning Research, n.81:1–15, 2018. Disponível em: https://bityl.co/C1Rv.

DEMIRGUÇ-KUNT, A. et al. The Global Findex Database 2014: measuring financial inclusion around the world. Policy Research Working Paper n. 7255, World Bank Washington, DC, 2015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1596/1813-9450-7255

DEVRIES, W. T. Protecting privacy in the digital age. Berkeley Tech. LJ, v. 18, p. 283, 2003.

EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT. Draft Report on artificial intelligence in a digital age. Comissão Especial sobre Inteligência Artificial na Era Digital (IADA), 2021. Disponível em: https://bityl.co/Bviw.

EUBANKS, V. Automating inequality: how high-tech tools profile police and punish the poor. NY, St Martin’s Press, 2017.

FRANÇA. Conseil Constitutionel, Sentença n° 2020-834 QPC de 3 de abril de 2020. Disponível em: https://bityl.co/C1UQ.

FRA - EUROPEAN UNION AGENCY FOR FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS. Fundamental Rights Report 2019, doi:10.2811/303379

GILLINGHAM, P. Predictive risk modelling to prevent child maltreatment: insights and implications from Aotearoa, New Zealand. Journal of Public Child Welfare. Vol. 11, 2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15548732.2016.1255697

GODWIN, M. Cyber rights defending free speech in the digital age. MIT Press, 2003. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/2258.001.0001

INTERNATIONAL SOCIAL SECURITY ASSOCIATION-ISSA. Relatório anual, 2020/2021, disponível em: https://bityl.co/BvjA.

INTERNATIONAL SOCIAL SECURITY ASSOCIATION-ISSA. Social security for the digital age: addressing the new challenges and opportunities for social security systems, 2019. Disponível em: https://bityl.co/BvNc.

KIRBY, M. International dimensions of cyberspace law protection of privacy and human rights in the digital age. LASIE, 1999.

KLAPPER, L.; SINGER, D. The opportunities and challenges of digitizing government-to-person payments. The World Bank Research Observer, v32, n2. 2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/wbro/lkx003

MENDES, L. S.; MATTIUZZO, M. Discriminação Algorítmica: conceito, fundamento legal e tipologia. Direito Público, v. 16, n. 90, 2019.

NETHERLANDS. Court The Hague, SyRI-wetgeving in strijd met het Europees Verdrag voor de Rechten voor de Mens, press release, 5 Número do caso: ECLI:NL:RBDHA:2020:865. Disponível na íntegra em: https://bityl.co/B8ml. Acesso em 02.02.2022.

NYST, C.; FALCHETTA, T. The right to privacy in the digital age. Journal of Human Rights Practice. v9, n1, p.104-118, 2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jhuman/huw026

O’NEIL, C. Weapons of math destruction how big data increases inequality and threatens democracy. New York Crown, 2016.

POST, R. C. Data privacy and dignitary privacy: Google Spain the right to be forgotten and the construction of the public sphere, Duke LJ, v67, p.981, 2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2953468

POLISH SUPREME COURT, case K 53/16, June 6th, 2018, http://trybunal.gov.pl/postepowanie-i-orzeczenia/komunikaty-prasowe/komunikaty-po/art/10168-zarzadzanie-pomoca-kierowana-do-osob-bezrobotnych.

SARLET, I. W. Proteção da personalidade no ambiente digital: uma análise à luz do caso do assim chamado direito ao esquecimento no Brasil. Espaço Jurídico: Journal of Law, v. 19, n. 2, p. 491-530, 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18593/ejjl.v19i2.17557

SARLET, I. W. et al. Estudos sobre proteção de dados pessoais. Saraiva Educação SA, 2022.

SAUNDERS, M. E. Digital-Age discrimination: the voting rights act language-minorities and online voter registration. Colum JL & Soc. v50, p.449, 2016.

Published

2022-06-27

How to Cite

Strapazzon, C. L. (2022). Digital welfare state: a digital transformation of social services. Espaço Jurídico Journal of Law [EJJL], 23(1), 87–108. https://doi.org/10.18593/ejjl.30342

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.