DEALING WITH THE PAST: PROSECUTION AND PUNISHMENT OF COMMUNIST CRIMES IN CENTRAL AND EASTERN EUROPEAN COUNTRIES / LIDAR COM O PASSADO: PROCESSOS PENAIS E PUNIÇÃO DE CRIMES COMUNISTAS NA EUROPA CENTRAL E ORIENTAL

Martin Faix; Ondrej Svacek

doi:10.18593/ejjl.v16i3.9787

Autores

Martin Faix Charles University
Ondrej Svacek Palacký University in Olomouc, Faculty of Law

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18593/ejjl.v16i3.9787

Resumo

This article addresses issues arising in the context of transition to democracy in Central and Eastern Europe, namely in Germany (former East Germany), Czech Republic, Slovakia and Hungary. The contribution reflects various means of transitional justice which were applied in these countries: access to the archives of secret police, lustration and prosecution of the crimes of the past (successor trials). Central issue of this article is the criminal prosecution of communist crimes. Here authors focus their attention on two interrelated aspects: choice of applicable law and statutory limitations, which both are linked to the principle of legality. Practice and methods in prosecution of the communist crimes adopted across the analyzed countries reveal considerable heterogeneity and from comparative perspective pose a unique legal laboratory. Despite differences in applicable law, including treatment and interpretation of statutory limitations, and differences in overall outcomes of prosecution and punishment of the communist crimes, all countries were conformed to requirements of the principle of legality. The article thus confirms that states, when dealing with their past, enjoy a wide margin of appreciation.

Keywords: Communist crimes. Central and Eastern Europe. Transitional justice. Successor trials. Nullum crimen sine lege.

Downloads

Não há dados estatísticos.

Biografia do Autor

Martin Faix, Charles University

JUDr, PhD, MJI at Charles University in Prague. senior lecturer in international law and member of the Center for Excellence - Research Centre for Human Rights (UNCE) at the Charles University in Prague, Faculty of Law, and Senior Lecturer in International Law at the Palacký University in Olomouc, Faculty of Law.

Ondrej Svacek, Palacký University in Olomouc, Faculty of Law

senior lecturer in international law at the Palacký University in Olomouc, Faculty of Law.

Referências

KORNAI, Janos. The Great Transformation of Central Eastern Europe. Success and Disappointment. Economics of Transition. 2006, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 207-244.

TEITEL, Ruti G. Transitional Justice. New York: OUP, 2000

ŠELIH, Alenka. Crime and Crime Control in Transition Countries. In: ŠELIH, Alenka, ZAVRŠNIK, Aleš (eds.) Crime and Transition in Central and Eastern Europe. New York: Springer, 2012, pp. 3-37

POP-ELECHES, Grigore. Historical Legacies and Post-Communist Regime Change. The Journal of Politics. 2007, vol. 69, no. 4, pp. 908-926.

HELICHER, Brad A. Klaus’s „Middle Game“: Repercussions of Privatization and Democratization in the Czech Republic. In: HANCOCK, M. Donald, LOGUE, John (eds.) Transitions to capitalism and democracy in Russia and Central Europe: achievements, problems, prospects. Greenwood Publishing Group, 2000

ASLUND, Anders. Building Capitalism: The Transformation of the Former Soviet Bloc. Cambridge: CUP, 2001

NEDELSKY, Nadya. Czechoslovakia and the Czech and Slovak Republics. In: STAN, Lavinia. Transitional Justice in Eastern Europe and the Former Soviet Union. London/New York: Routledge, 2009

TISMANEANU, Vladimir. Foreword. In: STAN, Lavinia. Transitional Justice in Eastern Europe and the Former Soviet Union. London/New York: Routledge, 2009

ŠIKLOVÁ, Jiřina. Lustration or the Czech Way of Screening. In: KRYGIER, Martin, CZARNOTA, Adam (eds.) Rule of Law After Communism. Sydney: Ashgate, 1999

QUILL, Adrienne. To Prosecute or Not To Prosecute: Problems Encountered in the Prosecution of Former Communist Officials in Germany, Czechoslovakia, and the Czech Republic. Indiana International and Comparative Law Review. 1996, vol. 7, no. 1, p. 174.

GALLANT, Kenneth. Principle of Legality in International and Comparative Law. Cambridge: CUP, 2010

CASSESE, Antonio. Nullum Crimen Sine Lege. In: The Oxford Companion to International Criminal Justice. Oxford: OUP, 2010, pp. 438-441.

BASSIOUNI, Cherif. International Criminal Law. International Enforcement. Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff, 2008.

HOFFMANN, Tamás. Trying Communist through International Criminal Law? The Experiences of the Hungarian Historical Justice Trials. In: HELLER, Kevin John, SIMPSON, Gerry. The Hidden Histories of War Crimes Trials. Oxford: OUP, 2013.

KÜHN, Zdeněk. Zločin a trest. In: BOBEK, Michal et al. (eds.) Komunistické právo v Československu. Brno: Masarykova univerzita, 2009, p. 217. [Crime and Punishment. In: The Communist Law in Czechoslovakia]

BRUCE, Gary. East Germany. In: STAN, Lavinia (ed.) Transitional Justice in Eastern Europe and the Former Soviet Union: Reckoning with the communist past. London: Routledge, 2009

SWEENEY, James A. The European Court of Human Rights in the Post-Cold War Era: Universality in Transition. London: Routledge, 2013

RIVERS, Julian. The Intepretation and Invalidity of Unjust Laws. In: DYZENHAUS, David (ed.) Recrafting the Rules of Law: The Limits of Legal Order. Oxford: Hart Publishing, 1999, pp. 50-53.

FERDINANDUSSE, Ward. Direct Application of International Criminal Law in National Courts. Hague: T.M.C. Asser Press, 2006

KREICKER, Helmut. National Prosecution of International Crimes from a Comparative Perspective: The Question of Genocide. International Criminal Law Review. 2005, vol. 5, issue 3, p. 319.

UDVAROS, Judit. Ungarn. In: Strafrecht in Reaktion auf Systemunrecht: Polen, Ungarn. Freiburg: Ed. Iuscrim, 2002, p. 284.

KOK, Ruth A. Statutory Limitations in International Criminal Law. The Hague: T.M.C. Asser Press, 2007

Judgments and other documents:

Pavel Čada et al. Regional Court in Plzeň, Judgment of 15 March 2001. Available at http://www.policie.cz/clanek/pravomocne-rozsudky.aspx [10/11/2015]

Saure v. Germany. ECHR, Appl. No. 78944/12.

Bundesgerichtshof, Fifth Criminal Senate, Judgment of 3 November 1992, case no. 5 StR 370/92

Streletz, Kessler and Krenz v. Germany, ECHR, Grand Chamber, Judgment, 22 March 2001

K.-H. W. v. Germany, ECHR, Grand Chamber, Judgment, 22 March 2001

High Court in Prague, Judgment of 1 October 2001 (Pavel Čada et al.)

Korbely v. Hungary. ECHR, Appl. no. 9174/02, Grand Chamber Judgment, 19 September 2008

Jiří Čepl and Milan Kubec. Regional Court in Plzeň, Judgment of 20 November 2001.

Miloš Roudnický. Regional Court in České Budějovice, Judgment of 27 April 2000. Quoted in Kühn, Z.: supra, p. 219. LEHKÝ, Miroslav. Classification of the crimes committed between 1948 and 1989 and the prosecutions of these crimes after 1990. In: Crimes of the Communist Regimes. Prague: The Institute for the Study of Totalitarian Regimes, 2011

BÍLKOVÁ, Veronika. Amicus curiae brief for the Constitutional Court of Peru. Venice Commission, Opinion No. 634/2011, 15 September 2011, pp. 7-8

Regional Police Directorate in Bratislava, KRP-20/OVK-BA-2009, 31March 2011

Hungarian Constitutional Court, Decision No. 53/1993, On War Crimes and Crimes Against Humanity, 13 October 1993

Czech Constitutional Court, Pl. ÚS 19/93, 21 December 1993.

Polednová v. Czech Republic. ECHR, Appl. No. 2615/10, Fifth Section, Decision on Admissibility, 21 June 2011

Supreme Court, 4 Tz 44/2002, Decision of 28 February 2002

Supreme Court, 7 Tz 44/2002, Decision of 28 August 2002

Supreme Court, Grand Panel, 15 Tdo 163/2005, Decision of 7 April 2005

Czech Constitutional Court, III ÚS 1318/12, Decision of 26 July 2012

Hungarian Constitutional Court, Decision No. 36/1996, 4 November 1996.