Intertwining consular and human rights law: a european contribution to the humanisation of international law
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18593/ejjl.27700Keywords:
consular assistance rights, human rights law, Jadhav case, humanisation of international law, European Court of Human RightsAbstract
In the context of Article 36.1 (b) of the 1963 Vienna Convention on Consular Relations (VCCR’63) interpretation by the International Court of Justice and the Inter-American Court of Human Rights, this paper helps to clarify how European Law developments reinforce a renewed understanding of Article 36 VCCR ’63 as regards its interaction with Human Rights Law. How could a developing case law of the European Court of Human Rights linking individual consular rights with several different rights guaranteed by the European Convention on Human Rights—along with the European Union’s quasi-constitutional normative approach, including consular rights within citizenship rights and due process common guarantees—condition the strongly State-centred interpretation of Article 36 VCCR ’63 by the International Court of Justice? The need for a reflection on an interpretative framework for a possible evolutionary, practice-based and teleological approach is highlighted by the recent ICJ’s decision on the Jadhav case (India v. Pakistan).
Downloads
References
Abrisketa Uriarte, J. (2013). Las sentencias piloto: El Tribunal Europeo de Derechos Humanos, de juez a legislador. Revista Española de Derecho Internacional, 65(1), 73-99. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26180555?seq=1
Aceves, W. J. (2000). The right of information on consular assistance in the framework of the guarantees of the due process of law. Advisory Opinion OC-16-99. American Journal of International Law, 94(3), 555-563. https://doi.org/10.2307/2555324 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2555324
Ahmad, M. A. (1973). L’institution consulaire et le droit international: Étude de la Convention de Vienne du 24 avril 1963 sur les relations consulaires et la pratique des États dans ce domaine. Librairie générale de droit et de jurisprudence.
Alston, P. (2014). Against a world court for human rights. Ethics and International Affairs, 28(2), 197-212. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0892679414000215 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0892679414000215
Bailliet, C. M. (2013). Measuring compliance with the Inter-American Court of Human Rights: The ongoing challenge of judicial independence in Latin America. Nordic Journal of Human Rights, 31(4), 477-495. https://www.idunn.no/ntmr/2013/04/measuring_compliance_with_the_inter-american_court_of_human DOI: https://doi.org/10.18261/ISSN1891-814X-2013-04-02
Bluntschli, J. C., Lardy, C., & Rivier, A. (1881). Le droit international codifié. 3a ed. Guillaumin.
Brems, E. (2014). Should pluriform human rights become one? Exploring the benefits of human rights integration. European Journal of Human Rights, 447-470. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2891288
Brems, E. (2018, January 6). Smart Human Rights Integration. In E. Brems, & S. Ouald Chaib (eds.), Fragmentation and integration in human rights law: Users' perspectives. Edward Elgar Publishers. https://ssrn.com/abstract=3097499 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4337/9781788113922
Buergenthal, T. (2006). The evolving international human rights system. American Journal of International Law, 100, 783-807. https://heinonline.org/HOL/P?h=hein.journals/ajil100&i=793 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0002930000031894
Buyse, A. C. (2009). The pilot judgment procedure at the European Court of Human Rights: possibilities and challenges. Nomiko Vima, 57(8), 1913-1927. https://heinonline.org/HOL/P?h=hein.journals/lwukrn2013&i=955
Cançado Trindade, A. A. (2005). International Law for Humankind: Towards a new jus gentium - general course on public international law - part I, 316 recueil des cours de l'académie de droit international de la Haye. Nijhoff.
Cançado Trindade, A. A. (2011). The access of individuals to international justice. OUP Oxford. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199580958.001.0001
Cebada Romero, A. (2013). El derecho internacional global: Una retórica útil para una transformación necesaria. Revista española de derecho internacional, 65(1), 15-42. http://www.jstor.org/stable/26180553
Cerna, C. M. (2013, April). El-Masri v. The former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia (Eur. Ct. H.R.). International Legal Materials, 52(2), 558-622. https://doi.org/10.5305/intelegamate.52.2.0558 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5305/intelegamate.52.2.0558
Charnovitz, S. (2012, July). Correcting America’s continuing failure to comply with the Avena judgment. American Journal of International Law, 106(3), 572-581. https://doi.org/10.5305/amerjintelaw.106.3.0572 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5305/amerjintelaw.106.3.0572
Crespo Navarro, E. (2017). Protection by affinity for unrepresented citizens of the European Union in the third countries. In: C. Jiménez Piernas, F. Pascual Vives, & L. Pasquali (eds.), Addressing the new challenges of the European Union: Solidarity and the protection of individuals (pp. 119-154). Giappichelli.
Commission of the European Communities (2003, February 19). Green paper on procedural safeguards for suspects and defendants in criminal proceedings throughout the European Union (COM/2003/75). https://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=COM:2003:0075:FIN:EN:PDF
Commission of the European Communities (2004, April 28). Proposal for a Council Framework Decision on certain procedural rights for criminal proceedings (COM/2004/328). https://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=COM:2004:0328:FIN:en:PDF
Cottier, T., & Hertig Randall, M. (2003, January). The prospects of 21st century constitutionalism. Max Planck Yearbook of United Nations Law, 7, 261-322. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/138946303775160377
Court of Justice of the European Union. (2015, October 6). Case C-650/13, Thierry Delvigne v Commune de Lesparre Médoc and Préfet de la Gironde. Grand Chamber. https://curia.europa.eu/juris/liste.jsf?oqp=&for=&mat=or&lgrec=pt&jge=&td=%3BALL&jur=C%2CT%2CF&num=C-650%252F13&page=1&dates=&pcs=Oor&lg=&pro=&nat=or&cit=none%252CC%252CCJ%252CR%252C2008E%252C%252C%252C%252C%252C%252C%252C%252C%252C%252Ctrue%252Cfalse%252Cfalse&language=en&avg=&cid=4164043.
De Hert, P., & Korenica, F. (2012). The doctrine of equivalent protection: Its life and legitimacy before and after the European Union's accession to the European convention on human rights. German Law Journal, 13(7), 874-895. https://doi.org/10.1017/S2071832200020794 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S2071832200020794
Decaux, E. (2011). The place of human rights courts and international criminal courts in the international system. Journal of International Criminal Justice, 9(3), 597-608. https://doi.org/10.1093/jicj/mqr023 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jicj/mqr023
De Mensch, F. A. (1846). Manuel pratique du Consulat, ouvrage consacré specialement aux Consuls de Prusse et des autres Etats formant le Zollverein. Brockhaus.
Domingo, R. (2011). Gaius, Vattel, and the new global law paradigm. European Journal of International Law, 22(3), 627-647. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejil/chr050 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ejil/chr050
Dubey, A. (2017, November). The Jadhav case before the International Court of Justice. Indian Journal of International Law, 57, 357-384. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40901-017-0067-2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40901-017-0067-2
Duffy, E. W. (2010, March). The Avena act: An option to induce state implementation of consular notification rights after Medellin. Georgetown Law Journal, 98, 795-826. https://heinonline.org/HOL/P?h=hein.journals/glj98&i=801
European Court of Human Rights. (2005, May 12). Case Öcalan v. Turkey, application no. 46221/99. Grand Chamber. http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/fre?i=001-69022
European Court of Human Rights. (2012a, July 21). Case of M. and Others v. Italy and Bulgaria, application no. 40020/03. Second Section. http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/fre?i=001-112576
European Court of Human Rights. (2012b, December 13) Case of El-Masri v. the Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, application no. 39630/09. Grand Chamber. http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-11562
European Court of Human Rights. (2014, July 17). Case of Kim v. Russia, application no. 44260/13. First Section. http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/fre?i=001-145584
European Court of Human Rights. (2016, February 23). Case of Nasr and Ghali v. Italy, application no. 44883/09. Fourth Section. http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-162280.
European Court of Human Rights. (2017, October 19). Case of Lebois v. Bulgaria, application no. 67482/14. Fifth Section. http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/fre?i=001-177698.
European Court of Human Rights. (2018). Case Azzolina and Others v. Italy, application nos 28923/09 and 67599/10. http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng-press?i=003-5900024-7526266.
Faggiani, V. (2017). Los derechos procesales en el espacio europeo de justicia penal. Thomson Reuters Aranzadi.
Falk, R. A. (1993). Human rights and state sovereignty (1981): The pathways of global constitutionalism. In R. A. Falk, R. C. Johansen, & S. S. Kim (eds.), The constitutional foundations of world peace: Logic and tinkering. Suny Press.
Field, D. D. (1876). Outlines of an international code. 2a ed. Baker, Voorhis & Company.
Fiore, P. (1890). Le droit international codifié et sa sanction juridique: Suivi d’un resumé historique des principaux traités internationaux. Chevalier-Marescq et. Cie Éditeurs.
French, D. (2006). Treaty interpretation and the incorporation of extraneous legal rules. International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 281-314. https://www.jstor.org/stable/3663163?seq=1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/iclq/lei082
Garlicki, L. (2007). Broniowski and after: On the dual nature of pilot judgements. In L. Caflisch, & L. Wildhaber (eds.), Liber amircoru luzius wildhaber, human rights–strasbourg views. N. P. Engel.
Glas, L. R. (2016). The functioning of the pilot-judgment procedure of the European Court of Human Rights in practice. Netherlands Quarterly of Human Rights, 34(1), 41-70. https://doi.org/10.1177/016934411603400104 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/016934411603400104
Gondek, M. (2005). Extraterritorial application of the European Convention on Human Rights: Territorial focus in the age of globalization?. Netherlands International Law Review, 52(3), 349-387. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1017/S0165070X05003499 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0165070X05003499
Haider, D. (2013). The pilot-judgment procedure of the European Court of Human Rights. Martinus Nijhoff Publishers. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004246447
Helmersen, S. T. (2013). Evolutive treaty interpretation: legality, semantics and distinctions. Eur. J. Legal Stud., 6, 161-188. https://heinonline.org/HOL/P?h=hein.journals/ejls6&i=165
Heyking, A. (1930). La théorie et la pratique des services consulaires. Recueil des Cours de l’Académie de Droit International, 34, 812-948.
Howell, N. M. (2013, June). A Proposal for US implementation of the Vienna convention's consular notification requirement. UCLA Law Review, 60(5), 1324-1381. https://heinonline.org/HOL/P?h=hein.journals/uclalr60&i=1358
Inter-American Court of Human Rights. (2000). Advisory opinion OC-16/99 of October 1, 1999. Requested by the United Mexican States. The right to information on consular assistance in the framework of the guarantees of the due process of law. https://www.corteidh.or.cr/docs/opiniones/seriea_16_ing.pdf
International Court of Justice. (1992, November 2). Oil Platforms (Islamic Republic of Iran v. United States of America). https://www.icj-cij.org/en/case/90
International Court of Justice. (1998, April 3). Vienna Convention on Consular Relations (Paraguay v. United States of America). https://www.icj-cij.org/en/case/99
International Court of Justice. (1999, March 2). LaGrand (Germany v. United States of America). https://www.icj-cij.org/en/case/104
International Court of Justice. (2003, January 9). Avena and Other Mexican Nationals (Mexico v. United States of America). https://www.icj-cij.org/en/case/128
International Court of Justice. (2017, May 8). Jadhav (India v. Pakistan). https://www.icj-cij.org/en/case/168
Jenks, C. W. (1958). The common law of mankind. Praeger.
Jessup, P. C. (1956). Transnational law. Elliots Books.
King, H. (2009). The extraterritorial human rights obligations of states. Human Rights Law Review, 9(4), 521-556. https://doi.org/10.1093/hrlr/ngp028 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/hrlr/ngp028
Komanovics, A. (2017, March 9). Transition from commitment to compliance: The efficacy of international human rights tribunals. Anuario da Facultade de Dereito da Universidade da Coruña, 20, p. 321-349. https://doi.org/10.17979/afdudc.2016.20.0.1927 DOI: https://doi.org/10.17979/afdudc.2016.20.0.1927
Kuhnert, K. (2006). Bosphorus-double standards in European human rights protection. Utrecht Law Rev., 2, 177. https://heinonline.org/HOL/P?h=hein.journals/utrecht2&i=373 DOI: https://doi.org/10.18352/ulr.31
Larsen, K. M. (213). Compliance with judgments from the European Court of Human Rights: The court’s call for legislative reforms. Nordic Journal of Human Rights, 31(4), 496-512. https://www.idunn.no/ntmr/2013/04/compliance_with_judgments_from_the_european_court_of_human_?languageId=2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.18261/ISSN1891-814X-2013-04-03
Leach, P., Hardman, H., & Stephenson, S. (2010). Can the European Court’s pilot judgment procedure help resolve systemic Human Rights violations? Burdov and the failure to implement domestic court decisions in Russia. Human Rights Law Review, 10(2), 346-359. https://doi.org/10.1093/hrlr/ngq011 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/hrlr/ngq011
Leach, P., Hardman, H., Stephenson, S., & Blitz, B. K. (2010). Responding to systemic human rights violations: An analysis of pilot judgments of the European Court of Human Rights and their impact at national level. Intersentia.
Leanza, U. (1997). Le droit international: D'un droit pour les Etats à un droit pour les individus. Une vision de la théorie et de la pratique des relations internationales contemporaines. In J. C. Llorens (coord.), Cursos euromediterráneos Bancaja de Derecho Internacional (pp. 27-222). Thomson Reuters Aranzadi.
Lee, L. T. (1966). The Vienna Convention on Consular Relation. Sijthoff.
Lee, L. T. (1969, January). Vienna Convention on Consular Relations. International Conciliation, 37, 41-[ii]. https://heinonline.org/HOL/P?h=hein.journals/intcon37&i=859
Lock, T. (2010). Beyond bosphorus: The European Court of Human Rights' case law on the responsibility of member states of international organisations under the European Convention on Human Rights. Hum. Rts. L. Rev., 10, 529. https://heinonline.org/HOL/P?h=hein.journals/hrlr10&i=535 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/hrlr/ngq022
Mallory, C. (2016, June). Abolitionists at home and abroad: A right to consular assistance and the death penalty. Melbourne Journal of International Law, 17, 51-82. https://heinonline.org/HOL/P?h=hein.journals/meljil17&i=61
Maresca, A. (1965). Considérations sur les derniers développements du droit diplomatique et consulaire. Revue de droit international de sciences diplomatiques et politiques, 43, 323-325.
Maresca, A. (1971). Les rélations consulaires et les fonctions du consul en matière de droit privé. Recueil des Cours de l’Académie de Droit International, 134, 105-162.
Maresca, A. (1974). Las relaciones consulares. Aguilar.
McGuinness, M. E. (2008a). Medellín v. Texas. American Journal of International Law, 102(3), 622-628. https://doi.org/10.2307/20456650 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/20456650
McGuinness, M. E. (2008b). Three narratives of Medellin v. Texas. Suffolk Transnational Law Review, 31(2), 227-246. https://heinonline.org/HOL/P?h=hein.journals/sujtnlr31&i=233
Meron, T. (1995). Extraterritoriality of human rights treaties. The American Journal of International Law, 89(1), 78-82. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2203895?seq=1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2203895
Meron, T. (2006). The humanization of international law. Brill Nijhoff.
Ruiz Miguel, C. (2018). The “Del Río Prada” Judgements and the Problem of the Enforcement of ECtHR Decisions. In M. Pérez Manzano, J. Lascuraín Sánchez, & M. Mínguez Rosique (eds.), Multilevel protection of the principle of legality in criminal law (pp. 213-234). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-63865-2_11 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-63865-2_12
Nowak, M. (2012). On the creation of world court of human rights. National Taiwan University Law Review, 7, 257-292. https://heinonline.org/HOL/P?h=hein.journals/ntulr7&i=257
Pausch, M. (2014). Democratization and elitism in the EU: Two opposing trends (Guest-Editor’s introduction to the topical collection on “The Future of Europe”). European Journal of Futures Research, 2(56), 2-9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40309-014-0056-3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40309-014-0056-3
Peters, A. (2006). Compensatory constitutionalism: the function and potential of fundamental international norms and structures. Leiden Journal of International Law, 19(3), 579-610. https://heinonline.org/HOL/P?h=hein.journals/lejint19&i=585 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0922156506003487
Petit de Gabriel, E. (2017a). Lebois v. Bulgaria: An Almost Obiter Dictum of Fundamental Character on the Consular Rights of Foreign Nationals. Yearbook of Diplomatic and Consular Law, 2. http://yearbookdiplomaticlaw.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/11/2017-Eulalia.pdf
Petit de Gabriel, E. (2017b). Los derechos consulares de los extranjeros detenidos: ¿Nuevas cartas em la baraja de los derechos fundamentales. Revista Electrónica de Estudios Internacionales, 33. https://doi.org/10.17103/reei.33.07 DOI: https://doi.org/10.17103/reei.33.07
Petit de Gabriel, E. (2003). Las exigencias de humanidad en el derecho internacional tradicional (1789-1939). Tecnos.
Pillet, A. (1889). Des Droits de la puissance protectrice sur l’administration intéri-eure de l’Etat protégé. Révue générale de droit international public, 2, 583-608.
Pillet, A. (1894). Le droit international public: Ses elements constitutifs, son domaine, son objet. Revue Générale de Droit International, 1, 1-31.
Pintos, E. V. (2016). Curso de derecho diplomatico y consular. Tecnos.
Pratap, R. (2017). Provisional Measures and the Jadhav Case. Groningen Journal of International Law, 5(2), 298-309. https://doi.org/10.21827/5a6afa3c5e843 DOI: https://doi.org/10.21827/5a6afa3c5e843
Politis, N. (1925). Le problème des limitations de la souveraineté et la théorie de l’abus des droits dans les rapports internationaux. Collected Courses of the Hague Academy of International Law, 6. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/1875-8096_pplrdc_A9789028604322_01 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/1875-8096_pplrdc_A9789028604322_01
Queralt Jiménez, A. (2018). Chronicle of an enforcement foretold: The effectiveness of the del río prada ECtHR judgement in Spain. In: M. Pérez Manzano, J. Lascuraín Sánchez, & M. Mínguez Rosique (eds.), Multilevel protection of the principle of legality in criminal law (pp. 195-212). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-63865-2_11 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-63865-2_11
Rea Falcón, M. E. (2017). Los extranjeros en Estados Unidos de América y el cumplimiento del artículo 36 de la Convención de Viena sobre relaciones consulares. RDUNED: revista de derecho UNED, 20, 527-557. http://e-spacio.uned.es/fez/eserv/bibliuned:RDUNED-2017-20-5110/Extranjeros.pdf DOI: https://doi.org/10.5944/rduned.20.2017.19476
Romano, C. P. R. (2017). Avena and other Mexican nationals (México V. United States of America), 2003 and request for interpretation of the judgment of 31 March 2004 in the case concerning Avena and other Mexican nationals (Mexico V. United States of America), 2008. In P. A. Wojcikiewicz, & J.-M. Sorel (eds.), Latin America and the International Court of Justice: Contributions to international law (pp. 183-194). Routledge.
Roukounas, E. I., & Hague Academy of International Law. (2003). Facteurs privés et droit international public. Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.
Sáenz de Santamaría, P. A. (2014, enero). Acerca del papel del Tribunal Europeo de Derechos Humanos y de la tentación de desacreditar al mensajero (a propósito de la STEDH (Gran Sala) en el asunto Del Río Prada c. España). Teoría y Realidad Constitucional, (33), 199-218. https://doi.org/10.5944/trc.33.2014.13041. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5944/trc.33.2014.13041
Scelle, G. (1932). Precis de droit des gens. Sirey.
Scott, J. B. (1930). The individual, the state, the international community. Proceedings of the American Society of International Law at Its Annual Meeting (1921-1969), 15-32. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272503700053143
Sicilianos, L.-A. (2014). The involvement of the European Court of Human Rights in the implementation of its judgments: Recent developments under Article 46 ECHR. Netherlands quarterly of human rights, 32(3), 235-262. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F016934411403200303 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/016934411403200303
Simma, B. (1994). From Bilateralism to Community Interests. Recueil des Cours de l’Académie de Droit International, 250. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/1875-8096_pplrdc_A9789041104199_02 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/1875-8096_pplrdc_A9789041104199_02
Soo, A. (2016). Potential remedies for violation of the right to counsel in criminal proceedings: Article 12 of the Directive 2013/48/EU (22 October2013) and its output in national legislation. European Criminal Law Review, 6(3), 284-307. https://www.nomos-elibrary.de/10.5771/2193-5505-2016-3-284/potential-remedies-for-violation-of-the-right-to-counsel-in-criminal-proceedings-article-12-of-the-directive-2013-48-eu-22-october2013-and-its-output-in-national-legislation-volume-6-2016-issue-3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5771/2193-5505-2016-3-284
Soo, A. (2017). Article 12 of the Directive 2013/48/EU: A starting point for discussion on a common understanding of the criteria for effective remedies of violation of the right to counsel. European Journal of Crime, Criminal Law and Criminal Justice, 25(1), 31-51. https://brill.com/view/journals/eccl/25/1/article-p31_3.xml?body=contentSummary-44180 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/15718174-25012105
Soo, A. (2017). How are the member states progressing on transposition of Directive 2013/48/EU on the right of access to a lawyer? An inquiry conducted among the member states with the special focus on how Article 12 is transposed. New Journal of European Criminal Law, 8(1), 64-76. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/2032284417699294 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/2032284417699294
Soo, A. (2018). (Effective) Remedies for a violation of the right to counsel during criminal proceedings in the European Union: An empirical study. Utrecht Law Review, 14(1), 18-60. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3128785# DOI: https://doi.org/10.18352/ulr.418
Stuart, G. (1934). Le Droit et la pratique diplomatiques et consulaires. Recueil des Cours de l’Académie de Droit International, 48, 459-570.
Teubner, G. (ed.) (1997). Global law without a state. Dartmouth.
Torres Bernárdez, S. (1963). La Convention de Vienne sur les relations consulaires (La Conférence des Nations Unies sur les relations consulaires). Annuaire français de droit international, 9(1), 78-118. https://doi.org/10.3406/afdi.1963.1025 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3406/afdi.1963.1025
Trechsel, S. (2004). A world court for human rights? Northwestern University Journal of International Human Rights, 1(1). https://scholarlycommons.law.northwestern.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1002&context=njihr
Venneman, R. (1965). La fin des consulats. Revue Belge de Droit International, 1, 148-161. http://rbdi.bruylant.be/public/modele/rbdi/content/rbdi_2016/RBDI%201965.1%20-%20pp.%20148%20a%20161%20-%20R.%20Venneman.pdf
Villegas Delgado, C. (2020). La Corte Internacional de Justicia y la paulatina humanización del derecho consular: De Breard a Jadhav. Revista Electrónica de Estudios Internacionales, 39. https://doi.org/10.17103/reei.39.04 DOI: https://doi.org/10.17103/reei.39.04
Von Bogdandy, A. (2006). Constitutionalism in international law: Comment on a proposal from Germany. Harvard International Law Journal, 47(1), 223-242. https://heinonline.org/HOL/P?h=hein.journals/hilj47&i=231
Walter, C. (2007). International Law in a Process of Constitutionalization. In A. Nollkaemper, & J. E. Nijman (eds.), New perspectives on the divide between national and international law (pp. 191-215). Oxford University Press on Demand. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199231942.003.0009
Wasilewski, T., & Żenkiewicz, M. (2018, February). The Jadhav case, India v. Pakistan (ongoing case at the International Court of Justice, 2017). Comparative Law Review, 23, 283-293. https://dx.doi.org/10.12775/CLR.2017.013 DOI: https://doi.org/10.12775/CLR.2017.013
Wright, Q. (1932). The legal position and functions of consuls, part. II. American Journal of International Law, 26(S1), 190-449. https://doi.org/10.2307/2213739 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2213739
Ziccardi Capaldo, G. (2008). The pillars of global law. Ashgate.
Žourek, J. (1962). Le statut et les fonctions des consuls. Recueil des Cours de l’Académie de Droit International, 106, 357-497.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Profa. Dra. Eulalia W. Petit de Gabriel
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Copyright: All manuscripts submitted become the property of the Unoesc and will not be returned to the author. It is a condition of publication that authors vest copyright in their paper, including abstracts, in the Universidade do Oeste de Santa Catarina - Unoesc. This enables us to ensure full copyright protection and to disseminate the paper to the widest possible readership in print and electronic formats as appropriate. Authors may, of course, use the article elsewhere after publication without prior permission from the Publishers, subject to the terms outlined on the Copyright transfer form.
