Limiting access to unapproved therapies: A paternalistic practice?

Authors

  • Martin Šolc

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18593/ejjl.23247

Keywords:

Health law, Unapproved therapies, Stem cell therapies, Medical paternalism, The Czech Republic

Abstract

The aim of the article is to answer the question of whether the limitations of the access to unapproved therapies outside of clinical trials are permissible in light of the modern paradigm of health care which is based on the patients’ autonomy of will. We only focus on the therapies consisting in the provision of unregistered medicinal products. The law is often restrictive in allowing patients to be provided with experimental therapies even if they grant fully informed consent. The Czech law and a recent Czech case of an unapproved stem cell therapy provide a basis for the analysis of the problem with universally applicable conclusions. We argue that the regulation of access to unapproved therapies serves an important public interest of the protection of public trust in the health system and hence is justified. The law should only permit access to experimental therapies that have sufficient scientific justifications. Under certain conditions, the patients can be allowed to cover the costs of the therapy.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS) Fact Sheet. (2019). National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke. Retrieved from https://www.ninds.nih.gov/Disorders/Patient-Caregiver-Education/Fact-Sheets/Amyotrophic-Lateral-Sclerosis-ALS-Fact-Sheet

Beauchamp, T. L., & Childress, J. F. (2013). Principles of Biomedical Ethics. (7th ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.

Caplan, A. (2016). Medical Ethicist Arthur Caplan Explains Why He Opposes “Right-to-Try” Laws. Cancer Network, 30(1). Retrieved from https://www.cancernetwork.com/oncology-journal/medical-ethicist-arthur-caplan-explains-why-he-opposes-right-try-laws

Cook, N., Hansen, A. R., Siu, L. L., & Abdul Razak, A. R. (2015). Early phase clinical trials to identify optimal dosing and safety. Molecular Oncology, 9(5), 97-1007.

Dostál, O. (2014). Poslední naděje za 150 000 korun. [The Last Hope for 150 000 CZK.] Medical Tribune. Retrieved from http://www.tribune.cz/clanek/33793-posledni-nadeje-za-korun

Durisotto v. Italy, application No. 62804/13 European Court of Human Rights (the decision of 6 May 2014).

Europe’s 10 Largest Acute Care Hospitals Have Sizeable Clinical Pathology Laboratories. (2010, April 23). Dark Daily. Retrieved from https://www.darkdaily.com/europes-10-largest-acute-care-hospitals-have-sizeable-clinical-pathology-laboratories-423

Harmon, K. (2012, January 7). How Has Stephen Hawking Lived Past 70 with ALS? Scientific American. Retrieved from https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/stephen-hawking-als/

Harvey, R. A., Clark, M. A., Finkel, R., Rey, J. A., & Whalen, K. (2012). Lippincott’s Illustrated Reviews: Pharmacology. (5th ed.). Baltimore, Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Wolters Kluwer.

Hlavatý, T. (2016). Základy klinického výskumu. [The Basics of Clinical Research.]. Bratislava, Praha: Grada Publishing..

ICD-11 Diagnosis of Factitious Disorder Imposed on Self. (2019). Retrieved from https://icd.who.int/dev11/f/en#/http%3a%2f%2fid.who.int%2ficd%2fentity%2f790764418

Kuře, J. (2009). Human Embryonic Stem Cell Research in Central and Eastern Europe: A Comparative Analysis of Regulatory and Policy Approaches. In A. Plomer, & P. Torremans, Embryonic Stem Cell Patents: European Law and Ethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Maron, D. F. (2016, June 30). Unproved Stem Cell Clinics Proliferate in the U.S. Scientific American. Retrieved from https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/unproved-stem-cell-clinics-proliferate-in-the-u-s/

Munzarová, M. (2005). Lékařský výzkum a etika. [Medical Research and Ethics]. Praha: Grada Publishing.

Obchod s nadějí. [The Business with Hope.]. (2015, November 9). Česká televize. [The Czech Television]. Retrieved from https://www.ceskatelevize.cz/ivysilani/1142743803-reporteri-ct/215452801240037/obsah/434334-obchod-s-nadeji

Obchod s nadějí II. [The Business with Hope II.]. (2016, May 30). Česká televize. [The Czech Television]. Retrieved from https://www.ceskatelevize.cz/porady/1142743803-reporteri-ct/216452801240020/video/475045

Pegg, S. (2019, February 12). Body modification – when consent is not a defence. The Conversation. Retrieved from https://theconversation.com/body-modification-when-consent-is-not-a-defence-87816

Phases of clinical trials. (2019). National Comprehensive Cancer Network. Retrieved from https://www.nccn.org/patients/resources/clinical_trials/phases.aspx

Resnik, D. B. (2018). The Ethics of Research with Human Subjects. Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing AG.

Rychlík, M. (2016, June 1). Pád profesorky Evy Sykové. [The Fall of Professor Eva Syková.] Lidové noviny. Retrieved from https://www.pressreader.com/czech-republic/lidove-noviny/20160601/281573764949024

Salač, J. (2019). Informovaný souhlas jako nástroj vyrovnání informačního deficitu ve vztahu lékař-pacient. [Informed Consent as an Instrument of Equalizing the Information Asymmetry in the Physician-Patient Relationship]. Paneurópske právnické listy, 2(1). Retrieved from http://www.paneuropskepravnickelisty.sk/index.php/salac-j/

Šolc, M. (2018). Právo, etika a kmenové buňky. [Law, Ethics and Stem Cells.]. Praha: Wolters Kluwer.

Šustek, P. (2016a). Klinický výzkum. [Clinical Research.] In P. Šustek, & T. Holčapek, Zdravotnické právo. [Health Law]. Praha: Wolters Kluwer.

Šustek, P. (2016b). Medicínský výzkum. [Medical Research.]. In P. Šustek, & T. Holčapek, Zdravotnické právo. [Health Law]. Praha: Wolters Kluwer.

Šustek, P. (2016c). Náležitý odborný postup (lex artis). Obecně. [Appropriate professional procedure (lex artis). In P. Šustek, & T. Holčapek, Zdravotnické právo. [Health Law]. Praha: Wolters Kluwer.

Šustek, P., & Šolc, M. (2018). Selling and Owning Human Body Parts in the Light of Human Rights: the Ideal and the Current Practice in the Czech Republic. In P. Šturma, V. A. Mozetic, Business and Human Rights. Waldkirchen: rw&w Science & New Media Passau-Berlin-Prague.

Šustek, P. (2018). Two Decades of the Convention on Biomedicine: Has It Been Any Good? In P, Šturma, Czech Yearbook of Public & Private International Law. Česká ročenka mezinárodního práva veřejného a soukromého. Praha: Česká společnost pro mezinárodní právo, 2018. Retrieved from https://rozkotova.cld.bz/CYIL-vol-9-2018/276

Teixeira Zorzanelli, R., Speroni, A. V., Menezes, R. A., & Leibing, A. (2017, January/March). Pesquisa com células-tronco no Brasil: a produção de um novo campo científico. [Stem cell research in Brazil: the production of a new field of science.] História, Ciências, Saúde – Manguinhos, 24(1), 129-144.

The Czech Republic Act No. 40 Coll., Criminal Code (2009).

The Czech Republic Act No. 48 Coll., on Public Health Insurance (1997).

The Czech Republic Act No. 268 Coll., on Medical Devices (2014).

The Czech Republic Act No. 372 Coll., on Health Services (2011a).

The Czech Republic Act No. 373 Coll., on Specific Health Services (2011b).

The Czech Republic Act No 378 Coll., on Pharmaceuticals (2007).

Wiffen, P., Mitchell, M., Snelling, M., & Stoner, N. (2012). Oxford Handbook of Clinical Pharmacy. (2nd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Žebříčku nejcitovanějších českých vědců vládnou chemici. [The List of the Most Cited Czech Scientists is Ruled by the Chemists.]. (2018, May 7). Česká pozice. Retrieved from http://ceskapozice.lidovky.cz/zebricku-nejcitovanejsich-ceskych-vedcu-vladnou-chemici-pel-/tema.aspx?c=A180504_110119_pozice-tema_houd

Published

2019-12-12

How to Cite

Šolc, M. (2019). Limiting access to unapproved therapies: A paternalistic practice?. Espaço Jurídico Journal of Law [EJJL], 20(2), 215–232. https://doi.org/10.18593/ejjl.23247

Issue

Section

HUMAN RIGHTS AND INTERNATIONAL CONTEXT