Access of cooperatives to the Tax Incentive for innovation in Brazil
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18593/race.17779Keywords:
Agricultural cooperatives, Tax Incentive for Innovation, Cooperate Act, Taxation, Organization and managementAbstract
The objective of the present paper is to elucidate the practices performed by farming cooperatives regarding the tax, accounting and administrative management linked to the Tax Incentive for Innovation (TII). In this sense, the relation between the tax regime of cooperatives and access to TII was investigated. For a better understanding of this, a research of qualitative nature, whose investigation method was the single case study, was performed, in which the analysis unit was a Brazilian Agroindustry Cooperatives Central. Such Central comprehends a group of 30 agroindustry cooperatives and has the largest industrial park of powdered milk in Latin America. Besides that, such organization houses Research & Development (R&D) department. As a result, it was inferred that the policies that regiment the incentive for innovation confront the nature of cooperatives, decreasing the capacity such organizations have in the appropriation of this policy. Thus, there is a reducer factor in the participation of cooperatives in TII. Hence, it is suggested a debate involving the diverse actors in the innovation system, in which cooperatives are involved, to decide if such reducer factor must be overcome or accepted. Finally, the tax, accounting and administrative management that routinely operates in the Central was able to respond to the new specific procedures related to the use of the policy in debate, without the implementation of new processes.
Downloads
References
Bardin, L. (2011). Análise de conteúdo. São Paulo: Edições 70.
Bialoskorski, S., Neto. (2016). Economics and management of cooperatives organizations. (2nd ed.). Saarbrucken: LAP Lambert Academic Publishing.
Bowers, J., & Khorakian, A. (2014). Integrating risk management in the innovation project. European Journal of Innovation Management 17(1), 25-40.
Bradburn, N., Sudman, S., & Wansink, B. (2004). Asking questions: The definitive guide to questionnaire design for market research, political polls, and social and health questionnaires. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Caldeira, A. C. (2007). Rota do cooperativismo: De Rochdale à estratégia negocial cooperativa. São Paulo: Pensamento e Realidade.
Cimoli, M., Ferraz, J. C., & Primi, A. (2005). Science and technology policies in open economies: The case of Latin America and Caribbean (Serie desarrollo productive, n. 165). Santiago de Chile: Cepal.
Davis, P., & Bialoskorski, S., Neto. (2010, jan./jun.). Governança e gestão de capital social em cooperativas: Uma abordagem baseada em valores. ESAC—Economia Solidária e Ação Cooperativa, 5(1), 1-24.
Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 532-550.
Freeman, C., & Soete, L. (2008). A economia da inovação industrial. Campinas: Editora Unicamp.
Ganiyu, R. A., Barbara, O. A., & Paul, O. O. (2018). Trends in business performance measurement: A literature analysis. International Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities Review, 8(1), 151-160.
Grazzi, M., & Pietrobelli, C. (2016). Firm innovation and productivity in Latin America and the Caribbean. New York: Springer Nature: Inter-American Development Bank.
Instrução Normativa 1.187, 2011.
Lei 5.764, 1971.
Lei 5.798, 2006.
Lei 11.196, 2005.
Lome, O., Heggeseth, A. G., & Moen, O. (2016). The effect of R&D on performance: Do R&D-intensive firms handle a financial crisis better? The Journal of High Technology Management Research, 27(1), 65-77.
Ministério da Ciência e Tecnologia. (2014). Relatório Anual da utilização dos incentivos fiscais à inovação tecnológica ano-base (N. CGIT/COID RA-LB-2014-SETEC/CGIT/COID).
Nelson, R. R. (2006). As fontes do crescimento econômico (Clássicos da Inovação). Campinas: Editora Unicamp.
Organização das Cooperativas Brasileiras. (2017). Agenda institucional do cooperativismo. Brasília, DF: OCB.
Organização das Cooperativas do Rio Grande do Sul. (2017). Expressão do cooperativismo gaúcho. Porto Alegre: OCRGS.
Parecer Normativo do Coordenador do Sistema de Tributação 73, 1975.
Rosenberg, N. (2006). Por dentro da caixa-preta- tecnologia e economia. São Paulo: Editora Unicamp.
Schneider, J. O. (2010). Educação e capacitação cooperativa: Os desafios no seu desempenho. São Leopoldo: Editora Unisinos.
Schumpeter, J. A. (1982). Teoria do desenvolvimento econômico (Coleção Os Economistas). São Paulo: Abril Cultural.
Seidman, I. (2006). Interviewing as qualitative research: A guide for researchers in education and the social sciences. New York: Teachers College.
Silva, C. L. da. (2017). Competitividade e estratégia empresarial: Um estudo de caso da indústria automobilística brasileira na década de 1990. Revista da FAE, 4(1).
Triguero-Cano, A., & Cuerva Narro, M. C. C. (2011, October). El cooperativismo agroalimentario ante el reto de la globalización: “Renovar-se o morir”. Revista de Economía Pública, Social y Cooperativa, (72), 97-124.
Tripodi, T., Fellin, P., & Meyer, H. J. (1975). Análise da pesquisa social: Diretrizes para o uso de pesquisa em serviço social e ciências sociais. Rio de Janeiro: Francisco Alves.
Warda, J. (2005, June). Measuring the Value of R&D Tax Provisions A Primer on the B-index Model for Analysis and Comparisons (OMC Working Group on “Design and evaluation of fiscal measures to promote business research, development and innovation”). JPW Innovation Associates INC.
Yin, R. K. (2010). Estudo de caso: Planejamento e métodos. (4a ed.). Porto Alegre: Bookman.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
RACE – Business, Accounting and Economy Journal from Publisher Unoesc is licenced with a Licence Creative Commons – Noncommercial Attribution 4.0 International.