Relato integrado e desempenho financeiro das empresas listadas na B3
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18593/race.19954Palavras-chave:
Relato Integrado, Responsabilidade Social Corporativa, Desempenho financeiroResumo
O Relato Integrado tem como proposta a criação de valor para todos os seus stakeholders, organizado em seis capitais: financeiro, manufaturado, natural, intelectual, humano, social e de relacionamento. Esta pesquisa analisou se as empresas listadas na Brasil, Bolsa, Balcão (B3), pertencentes aos setores de bens industriais, materiais básicos, consumo não cíclico e utilidade pública, têm seu desempenho financeiro influenciado pela publicação do Relato Integrado. Por meio da análise de Dados em Painel, com estimação pelos Efeitos Fixos e Efeitos Aleatórios, apurou-se que não há influência da RSC sobre o desempenho financeiro nas empresas que publicam o documento em estudo; esse resultado foi apurado tanto na análise conjunta das empresas quanto na análise por setor de atividade.
Downloads
Referências
Alves, N. J. F., Kassai, J. R., Lucas, E. C., & Ferreira, H. M. G. (2017). Relato Integrado e o formato da informação financeira para evidenciar a criação de valor das empresas do Programa Piloto. Revista Evidenciação Contábil & Finanças, 5(3), 99-122. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.18405/recfin20170306
Aupperle, K. E., Carroll, A. B., & Hatfield, J. D. (1985). An empirical examination of the relationship between corporate social responsability and profitability. The Academy of Management Journal, 28(2), 446-463.
Baboukardos, D., & Rimmel, G. (2016). Value relevance of accounting information under an integrated reporting approach: A research note. Jornal of Accounting and Public Policy, 35(4), 437-452. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2016.04.004
Baird, P. L., Geylani, P. C., & Roberts, J. A. (2012). Corporate social and financial performance re-examined: Industry effects in a linear mixed model analysis. Journal of Business Ethics, 109(3), 367-388. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-011-1135-z
Barth, M. E., Cahan, S. F., Chen, L., & Venter, E. R. (2018). The economic consequences associated with integrated report quality: Capital market and real effects. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 62, 43-64. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2017.08.005
Bommel, K. van. (2014). Towards a legitimate compromise? An exploration of Integrated Reporting in the Netherlands. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 27(7), 1157-1189. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ-04-2013-1309
Boulouta, I., & Pitelis, C. N. (2014). Who needs CSR? The impact of corporate social responsibility on national competitiveness. Journal of Business Ethics, 119(3), 349-364. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-013-1633-2
Carp, M., Păvăloaia, L., Afrăsinei, M.-B., & Georgescu, I. E. (2019). Is sustainability reporting a business strategy for firm’s growth? Empirical study on the Romanian capital market. Sustainability, 11(658), 1-21. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.3390/su11030658
Carroll, A. B. (1991). The pyramid of corporate social responsibiiity: Toward the moral management of organizational stakeholders. Business Horizons, 34, 39-48. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.1177/0312896211432941
Casonato, F., Farneti, F., & Dumay, J. (2018). Social capital and integrated reporting: Losing legitimacy when reporting talk is not supported by actions. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 20(1), 144-164. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.1108/JIC-08-2018-0132
Churet, C., & Eccles, R. G. (2014). Integrated Reporting, quality of management, and financial performance. Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, 26(1), 56-64. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-9173-6
Deegan, C. (2002). Introduction: The legitimising effect of social and environmental disclousures – a theoretical foundation. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 15(3), 282-311. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.1108/09513570210435852
Deegan, C., Rankin, M., & Tobin, J. (2002). An examination of the corporate social and environmental disclosures of BHP from 1983-1997: A test of legitimacy theory. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 15(3), 312-343.
Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.1108/09513570210435861
Dhaliwal, D., Li, O. Z., Tsang, A., & Yang, Y. G. (2014). Corporate social responsibility disclosure and the cost of equity capital: The roles of stakeholder orientation and financial transparency. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 33(4), 328-355. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2014.04.006
Dowling, J., & Pfeffer, J. (1975). Organizational legitimacy: Social values and organizational behavior. The Pacific Sociological Review, 18(1), 122-136. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.2307/1388226
International Integrated Reporting Council. (2013). Business and Investors Explore the Sustainability Perspective of Integrated Reporting.
Lee, K. W., & Yeo, G. H. H. (2016). The association between integrated reporting and firm valuation. Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, 47(4), 1221-1250. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.1007/s11156-015-0536-y
López, M. V., Garcia, A., & Rodriguez, L. (2007). Sustainable development and corporate performance: A study based on the Dow Jones Sustainability Index. Journal of Business Ethics, 75(3), 285-300. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-006-9253-8
Magnanelli, B. S., & Izzo, M. F. (2017). Corporate social performance and cost of debt: The relationship. Social Responsibility Journal, 13(2), 250-265. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.1108/SRJ-06-2016-0103
Malik, M. (2015). Value-enhancing capabilities of CSR: A brief review of contemporary literature. Journal of Business Ethics, 127(2), 419-438. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2051-9
Marti, C. P., Rovira-Val, M. R., & Drescher, L. G. J. (2015). Are firms that contribute to sustainable development better financially? Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 22(5), 305-319. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1347
Milne, M. J., & Patten, D. M. (2002). Securing organizational legitimacy. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 15(3), 372-405. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.1108/09513570210435889
Miras-Rodríguez, M. del M., Carrasco-Gallego, A., & Escobar-Pérez, B. (2015). Has the CSR engagement of electrical companies had an effect on their performance? A closer look at the environment. Business Strategy and the Environment, 24(8), 819-835. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.1848
O’Donovan, G. (2002). Environmental disclosures in the annual report: Extending the applicability and predictive power of legitimacy theory. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 15(3), 344-371. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1108/09513570210435870
Perlin, M., Kirch, G., & Vancin, D. (2018, February 22). Accessing Financial Reports and Corporate Events with GetDFPdata. Retrieved from SSRN:https://ssrn.com/abstract=3128252
Saeidi, S. P., Sofian, S., Saeidi, P., Saeidi, S. P., & Saaeidi, S. A. (2015). How does corporate social responsibility contribute to firm financial performance? The mediating role of competitive advantage, reputation, and customer satisfaction. Journal of Business Research, 68(2), 341-350. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2014.06.024
Samkin, G., & Schneider, A. (2010). Accountability, narrative reporting and legitimation The case of a New Zealand public benefit entity. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 23(2), 256-289. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1108/09513571011023219
Schreck, P. (2011). Reviewing the business case for Corporate Social Responsibility: New evidence and analysis. Journal of Business Ethics, 103(2), 167-188. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-011-0867-0
Sprinkle, G. B., & Maines, L. A. (2010). The benefits and costs of corporate social responsibility. Business Horizons, 53(5), 445-453.
Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2010.05.006
Suchman, M. C. (1995). Managing Legitimacy: Strategic and Institucional Approaches. Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 571-610. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.1995.9508080331
Surroca, J., Tribó, J. A., & Waddock, S. (2010). Corporate Responsability and financial performance: The role of intangible resources. Strategic Management Journal, 31(5), 463-490. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1002/smj
Tebini, H., M’Zali, B., Lang, P., & Perez-Gladish, B. (2016). The economic impact of environmentally responsible practices. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 23(5), 333-344. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1383
Testa, M., & D’Amato, A. (2017). Corporate environmental responsibility and financial performance: Does bidirectional causality work? Social Responsibility Journal, 13(2), 221-234. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1108/SRJ-02-2016-0031
Wen, L. P., & Heong, A. Y. K. (2017). Integrated Reporting and financial performance: Evidence from Malaysia. Management & Accounting Review, 16(2).
Yadava, R. N., & Sinha, B. (2016). Scoring sustainability reports using GRI 2011 Guidelines for assessing environmental, economic, and social dimensions of leading public and private Indian companies. Journal of Business Ethics, 138(3), 549-558. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2597-1
Zappettini, F., & Unerman, J. (2016). “Mixing” and “Bending”: the recontextualisation of discourses of sustainability in integrated reporting. Discourse & Communication, 10(5), 521-542. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1177/1750481316659175
Zhou, S., Simnett, R., & Green, W. (2017). Does Integrated Reporting matter to the capital market? Abacus, 53(1), 94-132. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1111/abac.12104
Downloads
Publicado
Como Citar
Edição
Seção
Licença
Autores mantêm os direitos autorais e concedem ao periódico o direito de primeira publicação, com o trabalho simultaneamente licenciado sob a Licença Creative Commons - Atribuição-NãoComercial 4.0 Internacional, que permite o compartilhamento do trabalho com reconhecimento de autoria e publicação inicial neste periódico.
