Inovação

Effect of NaCl replacement on physicochemical and sensory properties of the traditional cured coppa

Efeito da substituição de NaCl nas propriedades físico-químicas e sensoriais de Copa curada tradicional

Jocasta Di Domenico1, Alessandra Machado-Lunkes1, Bruna Regina Pereira da Rocha1, Naimara Vieira Prado1, Cleusa Inês Weber1 e Luciano Lucchetta1

1 Programa de Pós-Graduação de Tecnologia em Alimentos, Universidade Tecnológica Federal do Paraná (UTFPR), Francisco Beltrão, PR, Brazil

How to cite: Di Domenico, J., Machado-Lunkes, A., Rocha, B. R. P. da, Prado, N. V., Weber, C. I., & Lucchetta, L. Efeito da substituição de NaCl nas propriedades físico-químicas e sensoriais de Copa curada tradicional. Evidência, 24. https://doi.org/10.18593/evid.33247

Di Domenico, J.
jocasta_dido@hotmail.com
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2612-8673

Machado-Lunkes, A.
amachado@utfpr.edu.br
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7258-9905

Rocha, B. R. P. da
bruna_regina2404@hotmail.com
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0667-9387

 

Prado, N. V.
naimaraprado@utfpr.edu.br
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8952-7092

Weber, C. I.
cleusaines@utfpr.edu.br
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5821-0313

Luchetta, L.*
lucchetta@utfpr.edu.br
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9764-941X

* Corresponding author: UTFPR - Campus Francisco Beltrão, Rua Gelindo João Folador, nº 2000. Bairro Novo Horizonte 85602-863 - Caixa Postal 135, Bloco H

Francisco Beltrão-PR, Brasil

ABSTRACT: This study aimed to reduce sodium content in pork coppa without affecting consumer acceptance. NaCl reduction, partial replacement with KCl, and reduction in salting process time were evaluated. Six treatments were performed: Standard – 100% NaCl with a 2-day salting process and a 5-day re-salting process; T1 – a mixture of 70% NaCl/30% KCl; T2, T3, T4 – mixtures of 85% NaCl/15% KCl; T5 – 100% NaCl. T1 to T5 applied a 2-day salting process and a 2-day re-salting process. All treatments complied with Brazilian sodium guidelines. No statistically significant difference in consumer acceptance was observed. A reduction of 4 days in salting and re-salting processes maintained sensory characteristics and reduced sodium content by 50%. Even with reduced salt content, no changes in physicochemical parameters or effects on product preservation and microbiological quality were observed. NaCl reduction and replacement up to 30% KCl did not affect coppa characteristics or acceptance.

Keywords: Coppa, Sodium reduction, NaCl, KCl, Acceptance.

RESUMO: Este estudo teve como objetivo reduzir o teor de sódio em Coppa suína sem afetar a aceitação do consumidor. Foram avaliadas a redução de NaCl, a substituição parcial por KCl e a redução do tempo de processo de salga. Foram realizados seis tratamentos: Padrão – 100% NaCl com processo de salga de 2 dias e processo de re-salga de 5 dias; T1 – mistura de 70% NaCl/30% KCl; T2, T3, T4 – misturas de 85% NaCl/15% KCl; T5 – 100% NaCl. T1 a T5 aplicou-se um processo de salga de 2 dias e um processo de re-salga de 2 dias. Todos os tratamentos cumpriram as diretrizes brasileiras de níveis de sódio. Não houve diferença estatisticamente significativa na aceitação do consumidor. Uma redução de 4 dias nos processos de salga e re-salga manteve as características sensoriais e reduziu o teor de sódio em 50%. Mesmo com teor reduzido de sal, não foram observadas alterações nos parâmetros físico-químicos ou efeitos na preservação do produto e na qualidade microbiológica. A redução e substituição de NaCl até 30% KCl não afetaram as características ou aceitação do Coppa.

Palavras-chave: Copa, Redução de sódio, NaCl, KCl, Aceitabilidade.

INTRODUCTION

The processed foods and changes in the population’s eating habits resulted in increased sodium consumption, exceeding the limit recommended by the World Health Organization (World Health Organization [WHO], 2016). In many countries, about 80% of dietary sodium is obtained from the consumption of processed foods. The daily recommendation is less than 5 g of salt per day, whereas Brazil has an average consumption of 12 g per day (Nilson et al., 2017; WHO, 2016). In fact, in many cases, hypertension is related to changes in salt intake, causing blood pressure increase (Koç & Baysal, 2019). Thus, the food industry recognizes the need to respond to consumer demands to reduce the level of sodium in processed products (Pan American Health Organization [PAHO], 2015).

Salt (NaCl) is an important ingredient in meat products and is responsible for some technological properties such as the ability to solubilize the myofibril, leading to better adhesion and cohesiveness of dry-cured products (matured) (Inguglia et al., 2017). It impacts flavor and texture and mainly acts as a preservative, reducing water activity (Aw) (Pretorius & Schönfeldt, 2018; Yotsuyanagi et al., 2016). The reduction of sodium content in sausages may cause lipid oxidation, texture loss, and sensory characteristics changes. Therefore, the choice of the method used for this reduction must be carefully evaluated (Inguglia et al., 2017; Wong et al., 2019).

Strategies to reduce sodium content in meat products must be carefully evaluated including the use of metallic salt, salt reducer, salt replacer, and flavor enhancer. Sodium chloride can be replaced with other salts such as potassium chloride, potassium lactate, magnesium chloride and sulfate, and calcium chloride. However, potassium chloride (KCl) is the most used because its sodium chloride has similar properties and it is not associated with the development of cardiovascular or chronic disease (Inguglia et al., 2017; Triki et al., 2017). However, the use of KCl is still limited due to negative sensory attributes (Gaudette & Pietrasik, 2017; Stanley et al., 2017). Replacing up to 50% with KCl could introduce a bitter taste to the final product (Wong et al., 2019).

Moreover, some studies demonstrated that sodium reduction affects the dry-cured meat products characteristics in terms of sensory and physicochemical aspects (Gan et al., 2019) and microbiological changes may reduce the shelf life and acceptance by consumers (Pretorius & Schönfeldt, 2018).

Sodium occurs naturally in beef, pork, and poultry at concentrations ranging from 50 to 70 mg per 100 g, consequently, processed meat products contain high sodium levels in their formulations (Wong et al., 2019). In this context, coppa is a cured, matured, and smoked product, obtained from the entire pork neck, which is subjected to the curing process through the addition of curing salts and a high sodium chloride concentration during salting and re-salting processes (Di Domenico et al., 2020; Taddei et al., 2020).

As salt is one of the main coppa preservatives, its high concentrations, increase the sodium content, which is harmful to consumers’ health and intensify the salty taste. The challenge faced by the food industry concerns the consumers who accept less the highly salt meat products or the even slightly salty. On the other hand, reducing salt content makes the products more microbiological and physicochemical changes vulnerable (Aaslyng et al., 2014). The coppa is not yet included in the Brazilian agreement for the reduction of sodium in industrialized products (Instituto Brasileiro de Defesa do Consumidor [IDEC], 2014).

Previous studies showed that the salting and resalting time reduction and partial NaCl replacement by KCl was efficient in coppa technological process and the sensory evaluation complies with consumer expectations (Di Domenico et al., 2020). In order to configure the technological process, this work aimed to consolidate the salting process time and NaCl reduction by salt substitution while maintaining the physicochemical and sensory quality of Coppa.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Experimental design and coppa manufacture

Coppa samples were manufactured on an industrial scale according to the protocols of the swine slaughterhouse located in Chapecó (Santa Catarina, Brazil). Each treatment consisted of a batch of 80 kg of pork neck. The weight of each pork neck ranged from 0.900 kg to 1.400 kg. It was previously established that the ideal sample of coppa would be that subjected to 4 days salting process and re-salting process with 35% NaCl replacement with KCl (IBRAC®) (Di Domenico et al., 2020). From these data, a centroid simplex mixtures design was performed, resulting in five different formulations (Table 1). T2, T3 and T4 consisted the center point and repetition, respectively. A standard formulation was also used as a control, which is currently prepared in the company where this study was conducted. The independent factors were NaCl (0–100%) and KCl (0–30%). The response variables mensurated were sodium content, lipid oxidation, lipids, protein, moisture, Aw, pH, nitrate and nitrite content, texture, and acceptance hedonic test. All measures were performed in triplicate.

Table 1

Real and codified independent variables according simplex-centroid mixture design.

Formulation

Runs

Salting and re-salting processes (days)

Pseudo-component

Real values**

% NaCl (x1)

% KCl (x2)

% NaCl (x1)

% KCl (x2)

Standard

7

-

-

100

0

T1

4

0.00

1.00

70

30

T2*

4

0.50

0.50

85

15

T3*

4

0.50

0.50

85

15

T4*

4

0.50

0.50

85

15

T5

4

1.00

0.00

100

0

Standard treatment, the usual factory process, was used to compare to the others treatment; * Centroid point and Repetition; ** Percent of the ingredient in the mix of these ingredients.

Each treatment was obtained according to the experimental design (Table 1). The process consisted of subjecting the neckpieces to the dry salting process, using a blend containing commercial salt, sugar, nitrate, nitrite, clove, cinnamon, pepper, monosodium glutamate, ascorbic acid, and starters. Based on the experimental design, commercial salt was partially replaced with KCl (IBRAC®). The samples were stored in a cold chamber for 2 days/13 ºC. Then, the neckpieces were subjected to a dry re-salting process, using the same blend as the first step, except for starter culture. The samples were stored again in a cold chamber at 13 °C for more than 2 days.

Afterward, all pieces were washed in a chiller containing water at 30 to 40 °C to remove the blend of salty ingredients adhered to the surface. Subsequently, the pieces were embedded in an artificial collagen casing and subjected to natural smoking for 20 hours. Then they were kept in a maturation room for 30 days. Finally, the product was washed, casing removed, vacuum-packed, and stored at 22 °C.

Physicochemical analyses

The analyses were performed at the end of the maturation period (30 days). Therefore time 0 is after the end of maturation. Analyses of Sodium, Protein, Fat, Nitrite, Nitrate were performed only at time 0 (after the maturation period) to show reduction of NaCl and some minimum quality parameters. The analysis of moisture, oxidation Degree (TBARS), pH, Aw and texture were performed at time 0, 45, 90 and 105 days to demonstrate the behavior of these quality parameters during storage time.

All the analyses were performed in triplicate from independent samples obtained from each treatment. The coppa samples were analyzed for sodium content by the method of optical emission spectrometry with inductively coupled plasma (Association of Officiating Analytical Chemists [AOAC], 2005). The analysis was carried out using Shimadzu® equipment (Model ICPE-9000) with a reading at a wavelength of 589–592 nm. The results were expressed as mg of sodium 100 g-1.

The oxidation degree was determined by the 2-thiobarbituric acid reactive substances test (TBARs). The TBARs value was estimated using a double beam UV-VIS spectrophotometer at a wavelength of 532 nm (ELICO SL-218, Andhra Pradesh, India). The results were expressed as mg of MDA (malondialdehyde) kg-1 (Koniecko, 1985).

Moisture was determined according to the gravimetric method in a drying oven at 105°C (AOAC, 2005). Fat content was assessed by the Soxhlet extractor method. Protein content was determined through the Kjeldahl method, converted to crude protein using the 6.25 factor (AOAC, 2005).

The nitrate and nitrite contents were determined using a spectrophotometer at 540 nm (AOAC, 2005) at storage time zero. The nitrate was converted into nitrite by reduction on a spongy cadmium column. All nitrite was quantified by the Griess-Ilosvay reaction. The results were evaluated according to the maximum concentrations allowed by Brazilian legislation and were expressed as mg kg-1 (Brasil, 2019).

The Aw was measured in AquaLab equipment (4TE, Decagon Devices) and pH was determined using a micro-processed bench analyzer AK 96 (AKSO). The analysis was carried out at 0, 45, 90, and 105 days after coppa maturation.

Texture profile analysis (TPA) was performed using six replicates from each treatment (cubes of 20 mm × 20 mm × 20 mm), using a texture analyzer TA.XT (Stable Microsystems Ltd., Surrey, England). Hardness, cohesiveness, elasticity, and chewiness were analyzed at 0, 45, 90, and 105 days after coppa maturation. The samples were compressed to 50% of their original height by 4 mm s-1 in two cycles, five seconds between the cycles, using an aluminum cylinder probe (P/40).

For microbiological analysis, thermotolerant coliforms, coagulase-positive Staphylococcus, Salmonella sp. and Listeria monocytogenes were analyzed according to methods described by APHA (Vanderzant et al., 1992).

Sensory analysis was performed by 100 untrained judges in the laboratory of the Federal University of Technology Parana. Before the test, participants read and signed an informed consent form. A 9-point structured hedonic scale was used (1 = I did not like it much; 9 = I liked it very much) to evaluate color, flavor, texture, and overall acceptability attributes (Dutcosky, 2019). The product was analyzed at 0, 45, and 90 days of storage (the time estimated for distribution and commercialization of this type of product). This study was approved by the Research Ethics Committee of the Federal University of Technology Paraná (Approval No. 02153618.0.0000.5547).

Statistical analysis

The physicochemical and sensory data were analyzed by ANOVA and Tukey test, with a 5% significance level, using the Statistica software, version 7.0 (Stat Soft Inc., Tulska OK, USA). The results were expressed as mean ± standard deviation. The response surface method was also used to assess the influence of NaCl and KCl on the responses of physicochemical parameters. To verify the correlations between the samples and the sensory data, the data set of acceptance tests was assessed using principal components analysis (PCA), and the attributes were used as variables, applying covariance = n-1, in the XLSTAT® 2014 software.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Sodium content was significantly different (p<0.05) for all treatments in comparison with the standard. T5 and T1 had sodium concentration reduction by 50 and 36%, respectively (Table 2). These results demonstrate that the partial NaCl replacement with KCl and the salting and re-salting processes time reduction (Di Domenico et al., 2020) contributed to these results. In products such as hot dog sausage, ham, salami, and bacon, NaCl reductions between 20% and 50% caused a proportional decrease in sodium content (Aaslyng et al., 2014). NaCl Replacements of 70% and 50% with KCl in cured products such as loin and ham, respectively, were also reported (Armenteros et al., 2009).

The standard treatment showed the highest values of lipid oxidation at time 0 (Table 2). This fact may be related to their higher NaCl concentration, which possibly acted as a pro-oxidant agent (Cluff et al., 2016). Lipid oxidation increased in all treatments, except for the standard. T5 had the lowest lipid oxidation at the end of the storage period. Products often become rancid during prolonged storage (Argemí-Armengol et al., 2019).

Table 2

Physicochemical analyses, protein, fat, nitrite, nitrate, moisture, pH, Aw, Sodium content and lipid oxidation (TBARS) after 30 days of coppa maturation.

Day

S

T1

T2

T3

T4

T5

Sodium (mg/kg)

0

3069.33 ±5.03a

1972.26±143.27bc

2463.68±482.58ab

2189.62±134.72bc

2114.12±497.35bc

1504.94±170.04c

Protein

31.95 ± 1.69a

35.74 ± 2.37a

31.37 ± 5.27a

35.81 ± 5.50a

36.47 ± 2.69a

33.29 ± 2.70a

Fat

21.00 ± 0.86a

17.19 ± 2.53a

18.50 ± 4.23a

17.03 ± 3.14a

16.44 ± 2.96a

18.22 ± 5.25a

Nitrite

4.14 ± 14.70a

10.44 ± 5.99a

6.50 ± 3.25a

10.28 ± 6.72a

6.21 ± 0.85a

11.52 ± 10.27a

Nitrate

12.59 ± 14.70a

6.46 ± 1.59a

14.54 ± 6.48a

12.05 ± 5.68a

31.83 ± 27.22a

8.87 ± 5.50a

Moisture

0

33.04 ± 8.93a

42.11 ± 1.75a

39.66 ± 1.91a

38.39 ± 3.26a

36.70 ± 0.27a

38.46 ± 1.56a

45

37.09 ± 4.30a

40.76 ± 0.82a

35.97 ± 1.20a

38.22 ± 2.73a

36.40 ± 0.24a

41.21 ± 2.15a

90

38.50 ± 1.00a

39.90 ± 0.01a

25.27 ± 19.03a

40.48 ± 0.01a

39.10 ± 0.00a

39.06 ± 0.02a

105

36.76 ± 0.02d

33.78 ± 0.02e

40.64± 0.02a

40.58 ± 0.01a

39.06 ± 0.01b

38.10 ± 0.02c

TBARS (mg of MDA/Kg)

0

0.18 ± 0.01a

0.11 ± 0.00b

0.11 ± 0.01b

0.09 ± 0.00d

0.11 ± 0.00b

0.10 ±0.01c

105

0.17 ± 0.01b

0.17 ± 0.02b

0.22 ± 0.01a

0.17 ± 0.01b

0.17 ± 0.01b

0.12 ± 0.01c

Aw

0

0.82 ± 0.00b

0.827 ± 0.01b

0.859 ± 0.01a

0.812± 0.00b

0.848 ± 0.00a

0.862 ± 0.00a

45

0.873 ± 0.01a

0.843 ± 0.00c

0.835 ± 0.00cd

0.799 ± 0.00e

0.825 ± 0.00d

0.861 ± 0.00b

90

0.837 ± 0.00b

0.819± 0.00c

0.807 ± 0.00e

0.785 ± 0.01f

0.815 ± 0.00d

0.846 ± 0.00a

105

0.834 ± 0.00a

0.834 ± 0.00a

0.825 ± 0.00b

0.808 ± 0.00d

0.815 ± 0.00c

0.831 ± 0.00a

pH

0

5.79 ± 0.05a

5.79 ± 0.08a

5.87 ± 0.17a

5.89 ± 0.14a

5.67 ± 0.12a

5.63 ± 0.08a

45

5.81 ± 0.14a

6.15 ± 0.19a

5.94 ± 0.17a

6.11 ± 0.22a

6.13 ± 0.14a

5.88 ± 0.15a

90

6.16 ± 0.00bc

6.34 ± 0.01a

6.10 ± 0.03c

6.12 ±0.03bc

6.13 ±0.03bc

6.18 ± 0.01b

105

6.19 ± 0.42a

6.37 ± 0.06a

6.15 ± 0.23a

5.63 ± 0.46a

6.00 ± 0.16a

5.91± 0.08a

S= Standard (NaCl 100% + 7 days of salting); T1 – (NaCl 70% + 30% KCL 4 days of salting); T2 – (NaCl 85% + 15% KCl + 4 days of salting); T3 – (NaCl 85% + 15% KCl + 4 days of salting); T4 – (NaCl 85% + 15% KCl + 4 days of salting); T5 – (NaCl 100% + 4 days of salting). Mean rates (n = 3) followed by their standard deviation. Means followed by the same small letter in the same column do not statistically differ at 5% significance by Tukey test (p < 0.05). MDA = malondialdehyde. x1: NaCl; x2:KCl.

A Scheffé model was obtained in the ANOVA, with an adjusted coefficient of determination (R²aj) of 86.41 for sodium content, i.e., the model explained 86.41% (Supplementary data 1). Beholden the coefficients x1 (NaCl) and x2 (KCl), x1 showed a higher contribution to the sodium content, although both showed interaction in the final sodium content of the produced coppa. For lipid oxidation, the lack of adjustment was significant for the models; however, the mean square value was equal to zero for both models, indicating that the lack of adjustment is not relevant. According to the equation, for lipid oxidation at 105 days storage, the model explained 66.90% and showed that NaCl had a higher contribution to oxidation than KCl and that their interaction had more effect on oxidation than KCl (Supplementary data 1).

The coppa nitrite and nitrate levels at the beginning of storage were no significantly different (p>0.05) between treatments (Table 2) and met the maximum limit established by Brazilian legislation (Brasil, 2019). The models obtained from ANOVA were not significant (p>0.05) and the lack of adjustment for the other analyses was not relevant, as the mean square of the pure error was equal to zero for all parameters (Supplementary data 1). The fact that the lack of fit was significant should not be considered relevant when the average square of the pure error is low (Box & Draper, 1987); therefore, the total residuals from the model are decomposed in pure error and lack of fit (Bruns et al., 2005). Nitrite and nitrate are curing salts classified as preservative substances, with the function of preventing or delaying microbial or enzymatic activity. In addition, they promote color fixation, flavor development, and aroma typical of cured meat products (Iamarino et al., 2015).

Protein and fat content had no significant difference between treatments (Table 2), corroborating studies that used KCl to NaCl replace in cured sausages (Tejada et al., 2021), cured bacon (Wu et al., 2015), and cured leg (Domínguez et al., 2016; Ferreira et al., 2009).

NaCl and KCl did not affect protein, nitrate, and nitrite, which is justified by the lack of adjustment of the model and the low value of the coefficient of determination (R²). This fact may be related to the coppa characteristics, as each sample unit consisted of different pieces, which had high variability in the cut characteristics (pork neck cut) (Supplementary data 1).

The moisture results were not significant (p>0.05) between treatments up to 90 days storage and may be related to the smoking process and maturation conditions (Table 2). The maturation area conditions and the intrinsic characteristics of the raw material, due to the differences in the percentage of intramuscular fat, interfere in the loss of moisture (Price et al., 1994). There was a significant difference in moisture content between treatments at 105 days storage, and T2 and T3 lost less moisture. The standard treatment presented the lowest moisture content, indicating that higher NaCl content promotes greater coppa dehydration. Similar behavior was observed for bacon, in which the treatment added with KCl had the highest moisture value (46.1%), whereas the product containing 100% NaCl had a moisture value of 42.29% (Wu et al., 2015). These differences may occur due to the faster penetration of salt mixtures containing KCl, preventing water from leaving the meat (Aliño et al., 2009) however, for cured loin, this behavior was not observed (Armenteros et al., 2012).

There were significant differences in Aw values between treatments and met the reference value established by Brazilian legislation (≤0.90) during the storage period (Brasil, 2022b) (Table 2). The salting process contributes to reducing Aw by changing the osmotic pressure, favoring coppa stability and preservation, due to the inhibition of the development of microorganisms (Vignoto et al., 2010). The ANOVA model was not significant (p>0.05) and there was a lack of adjustment; however, it is of little relevance as the mean square of the pure error was zero (Supplementary data 1). NaCl and KCl had no direct correlation with this parameter. This evidences that the NaCl replacement with KCl had no negative effect on the water activity, and that the obtained values are related to the parameters of humidity, temperature, and ventilation of the room where the product was exposed, during the maturation period.

The coppa pH was not affected by the NaCl reduction and replacement with KCl (p>0.05) (Table 2), similarly to cured products such as bacon (Delgado-Pando et al., 2018). However, in smoked pork loin, samples with higher NaCl content had lower pH (Haddad et al., 2018). The pH values subjected to ANOVA showed that the model was not significant (p>0.05) and that the NaCl and KCl addition and interaction had little effect on this parameter (Supplementary data 1).

Regarding texture, the replacement of NaCl with KCl and the reduced salting time did not affect the coppa hardness (Table 3). There was only a significant difference (p<0.05) at 105 days of storage, comparing the treatments to the standard. Cohesiveness did not significantly differ (p>0.05) between treatments; however, there was a significant difference (p<0.05) for chewiness (45 and 105 days of storage) and elasticity (45 days of storage) (Table 3). Texture variations are strongly related to the drying and maturation of the coppa due to the loss of water during these processes and the formation of crust on the product. The reduction of NaCl in coppa, similarly to other meat products, may have increased proteolysis, leading to an increase in tenderness (Toldrá, 2007). Similar behavior of reduced hardness and chewiness was observed in cooked ham when NaCl was replaced with a salt mixture containing potassium chloride and ammonium chloride (O’ Neill et al., 2018). According to the ANOVA the model was not significant (p>0.05) and there was a lack of adjustment (p>0.05); however, the mean square of the pure error was equal to zero for all parameters at all times. For hardness and chewiness, there was no difference between the effects generated by the addition of NaCl and KCl, whereas cohesiveness and elasticity did not correlate with the salts (Supplementary data 2).

Table 3

Texture profile of reduced sodium pork coppa at 0, 45, 90 and 105 days of storage period.

Source

days

S

T1

T2

T3

T4

T5

Hardness

0

8226.00 ± 1850.22a

8481.41 ± 1891.47a

7454.52 ± 1213.82a

8399.97 ± 2574.72a

8584.84 ± 2070.65a

8640.59 ± 1786.39a

45

8480.67 ± 1933.40a

6912.28 ± 2263.66a

6552.09 ± 1570.61a

6428.27 ± 2116.01a

8944.37 ± 2983.99a

6357.53 ± 3267.05a

90

7555.95 ± 806.30a

7543.69 ± 1413.54a

8870.34 ± 1893.94a

9096.83 ± 1047.14a

8764.44 ± 1829.23a

7307.45 ± 1755.07a

105

7803.01 ± 2808.58a

3109.48 ± 1183.12b

3773.62 ± 1580.31b

4693.47 ± 2086.03b

5481.31 ± 2130.04ab

3971.83 ± 1822.94b

Cohesiveness

0

0.62 ± 0.05a

0.57 ± 0.06a

0.60 ± 0.04a

0.50 ± 0.21a

0.58 ± 0.24a

0.56 ± 0.02a

45

0.60 ± 0.03a

0.60 ± 0.06a

0.56 ± 0.07a

0.55 ± 0.02a

0.58 ± 0.03a

0.53 ± 0.07a

90

0.60 ± 0.06a

0.60 ± 0.04a

0.63 ± 0.08a

0.59 ± 0.04a

0.57 ± 0.05a

0.63 ± 0.05a

105

0.51 ± 0.21a

0.52 ± 0.05a

0.56 ± 0.03a

0.53 ± 0.05a

0.54 ± 0.07a

0.58 ± 0.05a

Chewiness

0

4186.66 ± 979.17a

3623.68 ± 1205.44a

3226.77 ± 659.19a

3533.31 ± 638.29a

4331.64 ± 487.73a

3573.48 ± 539.10a

45

4205.43 ± 1050.35a

3373.55 ± 1327.26abc

2682.30 ± 795.77bc

2687.97 ± 2116.01bc

3960.30 ± 936.55ab

2025.39 ± 647.75c

90

3351.84 ± 983.69a

3661.17 ± 593.69a

3629.66 ± 1782.01a

4094.52 ± 737.40a

3934.47 ± 801.07a

3672.68 ± 1007.35a

105

2487.10 ± 1198.02a

1058.67 ± 350.55b

1401.79 ± 529.10ab

1480.12 ± 624.72ab

1877.66 ± 830.33ab

1661.96 ± 754.94ab

Elasticity

0

0.83 ± 0.26a

0.73 ± 0.03a

0.71 ± 0.08a

0.67± 0.27a

0.71 ± 0.29a

0.74 ± 0.06a

45

0.81 ± 0.04a

0.79 ±0.07ab

0.71 ± 0.06bc

0.76 ±0.06ab

0.79 ±0.05ab

0.66 ± 0.06c

90

0.72 ± 0.14a

0.80 ± 0.04a

0.68 ± 0.28a

0.75 ± 0.06a

0.78 ± 0.07a

0.79 ± 0.05a

105

0.60 ± 0.26a

0.65 ± 0.04a

0.66 ± 0.06a

0.60 ± 0.04a

0.64 ± 0.11a

0.71 ± 0.05a

S= Standard (NaCl 100% + 7 days of salting); T1 – (NaCl 70% + 30% KCL 4 days of salting); T2 – (NaCl 85% + 15% KCl + 4 days of salting); T3 – (NaCl 85% + 15% KCl + 4 days of salting); T4 – (NaCl 85% + 15% KCl + 4 days of salting); T5 – (NaCl 100% + 4 days of salting). Mean rates (n = 3) followed by their standard deviation. Means followed by the same small letter in the same column do not statistically differ at 5% significance by Tukey test (p < 0.05).

Microbiological results of thermotolerant coliforms, coagulase-positive Staphylococcus, Salmonella sp. and Listeria monocytogenes attended the limits established for microbiological sanitary Brazilian standards for food (Brasil, 2022a, 2022b).

Concerning sensory analysis, there was no significant difference between treatments for color, flavor, texture, and overall impression (Table 4). This evidences that the NaCl reduction and its replacement with KCl by up to 30% and the reduced salting process time did not interfere with the acceptance of the coppa evaluated by the panelists (Table 4). According to the ANOVA performed for T1, T2, T3, T4, and T5, the models had no significant difference (p>0.05) for the parameters and times evaluated, except for color at 45 days storage (Supplementary data 3). For the parameters color, flavor, texture, and overall impression at all times, there was a lack of adjustment to the model (p≥0.05). In the case of significant difference (p<0.05), the model should be used with caution; however, the mean square error was equal to zero, which makes the lack of adjustment a little relevant.

The PCA graph (Figure 1) shows that each vector corresponds to the independent variable and the vertices represent the dependent variables. The first main component resulted in two distinct groups. The first one is located to the left of the figure and included the independent variables color (90), texture (0), flavor (45), overall impression, and the dependent variable days of salting. Thus, the variation of salting days had a higher effect on these independent variables. The second group, on the right, included the dependent variable KCl, consequently, KCl content has a small positive influence on the dependent variables presented in the first quadrant. The second main component discriminated the independent variables in the role of NaCl content in the treatments, with 47.70% of the variation between the treatments applied. The NaCl content resulted in more positive scores represented by the sensory attributes of color, flavor, texture, and overall impression. The first main component accounted for 25.23% of the variation, which explains that the KCl content used in this study, although presenting negative scores for most of the sensory attributes, showed no significant difference (Table 4) for the sensory attributes evaluated.

Table 4

Sensory parametrs of reduced sodium pork coppa at 0, 45, 90 days of storage period.

Source

days

S

T1

T2

T3

T4

T5

Color

0

7.25 ± 1.21ª

7.40 ± 1.22ª

7.47 ± 1.01ª

7.2 ± 1.37ª

7.51 ± 1.07ª

7.28 ± 1.32ª

45

7.38 ± 1.17ª

7.57 ± 1.08ª

7.30 ± 1.34ª

7.07 ± 1.23ª

7.50 ± 1.02ª

7.28 ± 1.29ª

90

7.61 ± 1.14ª

7.38 ± 1.45ª

7.69 ± 1.00a

7.58 ± 1.36ª

7.61 ± 0.93ª

7.60 ± 1.14ª

Flavor

0

7.25 ± 1.37ª

7.23 ± 1.24ª

7.3 ± 1.20ª

6.94 ± 1.40ª

7.05 ± 1.56ª

6.95 ± 1.56ª

45

7.19 ± 1.37ª

7.05 ± 1.56ª

7.37 ± 1.20ª

6.84 ± 1.47ª

7.28 ± 1.38ª

7.37 ± 1.26ª

90

7.43 ± 1.17ª

7.17 ± 1.27ª

6.95 ± 1.44ª

7.15 ± 1.35ª

7.27 ± 1.27ª

7.05 ± 7.06ª

Texture

0

7.00 ± 1.44ª

6.97 ± 1.57ª

7.33 ± 1.11ª

6.8 ± 1.56ª

7.16 ± 1.45ª

7.13 ± 1.37ª

45

7.25 ± 1.29ª

7.28 ± 1.31ª

7.24 ± 1.29ª

7.07 ± 1.35ª

7.38 ± 1.31ª

7.25 ± 1.33ª

90

7.08 ± 1.45ª

7.25 ± 1.34ª

7.06 ± 1.28ª

7.06 ± 1.58ª

7.16 ± 1.16ª

7.05 ± 1.35ª

Overall Liking

0

7.00 ± 1.34ª

7.23 ± 1.19ª

7.35 ± 1.09ª

6.87 ± 1.34ª

7.12 ± 1.31ª

6.98 ± 1.39ª

45

7.09 ± 1.33ª

7.07 ± 1.53ª

7.10 ± 1.51ª

6.83 ± 1.31ª

7.12 ± 1.32ª

7.18 ± 1.16ª

90

7.29 ± 1.06ª

7.12 ± 1.31ª

7.09 ± 1.16ª

7.28 ± 1.33ª

7.14 ± 1.23ª

7.01 ± 1.30ª

S= Standard (NaCl 100% + 7 days of salting); T1 – (NaCl 70% + 30% KCL 4 days of salting); T2 – (NaCl 85% + 15% KCl + 4 days of salting); T3 – (NaCl 85% + 15% KCl + 4 days of salting); T4 – (NaCl 85% + 15% KCl + 4 days of salting); T5 – (NaCl 100% + 4 days of salting). Mean rates followed by their standard deviation. Means followed by the same small letter in the same column do not statistically differ at 5% significance by Tukey test (p < 0.05).

Figure 1

Principal component analysis of sensory parameters from reduced sodium pork coppa at 0, 45, 90 days of storage period

In ready-to-eat frozen roasted meat, NaCl replacement with 30% KCl showed no difference in sensory acceptance and did not affect the microbiological stability of the product (Bis et al., 2016). In bacon, up to 40%, KCl replacement had no negative effects on sensory quality, whereas the NaCl replacement with 60% KCl resulted in a less salting taste, but a bitter taste was perceived (Li et al., 2016). In Italian salami, no significant differences (p>0.05) were found between the formulations for color, odor, and texture; however, the tasters detected a bitter taste from KCl (Fieira et al., 2018). Products with reduced sodium content have a reduced ability to suppress the bitter taste of KCl (Gaudette & Pietrasik, 2017).

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrates the alteration of the standard process of 7 days and NaCl substitution provided a 50% reduction in sodium content in the final product. The time of 4 days in which the product was exposed to salt was effective to reduce the sodium content. The reduced NaCl content did not interfere with Coppa Aw and moisture, important parameters for the microbiological conservation of the product. There were no differences in the acceptance of Coppa swine as to its color, flavor, texture and overall impression. This demonstrates that the reduction of NaCl and its replacement by up to 30% of KCl did not affect the sensory parameters of Coppa.

Acknowledgments

To the Brazilian National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq), Araucária Foundation, Federal Technological University of Paraná, Aurora Alimentos.

REFERENCES

Aaslyng, M. D., Vestergaard, C., & Koch, A. G. (2014). The effect of salt reduction on sensory quality and microbial growth in hotdog sausages, bacon, ham and salami. Meat Science, 96(1), 47-55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2013.06.004

Aliño, M., Grau, R., Toldrá, F., Blesa, E., Pagán, M. J., & Barat, J. M. (2009). Influence of sodium replacement on physicochemical properties of dry-cured loin. Meat Science, 83(3), 423-430. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2009.06.022

Argemí-Armengol, I., Villalba, D., Ripoll, G., Teixeira, A., & Álvarez-Rodríguez, J. (2019). Credence cues of pork are more important than consumers’ culinary skills to boost their purchasing intention. Meat Science, 154, 11-21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2019.04.001

Armenteros, M., Aristoy, M.-C., Barat, J. M., & Toldrá, F. (2012). Biochemical and sensory changes in dry-cured ham salted with partial replacements of NaCl by other chloride salts. Meat Science, 90(2), 361-367. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2011.07.023

Armenteros, M., Aristoy, M.-C., & Toldrá, F. (2009). Effect of sodium, potassium, calcium and magnesium chloride salts on porcine muscle proteases. European Food Research and Technology, 229(1), 93-98. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00217-009-1029-9

Association of Officiating Analytical Chemists [AOAC]. (2005). Official method of Analysis. 18th Edition, Association of Officiating Analytical Chemists, Washington DC, Method 935.14 and 992.24. References-Scientific Research Publishing. https://www.scirp.org/(S(351jmbntvnsjt1aadkposzje))/reference/ReferencesPapers.aspx?ReferenceID=2033299

Bis, C. V., Barretto, T. L., Henck, J. M. M., Mathias, J. C., Oliveira, L. S., & Barretto, A. C. D. S. (2016). Physicochemical characteristics and sensory acceptability of ready-to-eat sliced frozen roast beef with partial reduction of sodium chloride. Food Science and Technology, 36(2), 286-289. https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-457X.0056

Box, G. E. P., & Draper, N. Richard. (1987). Empirical Model-Building and Response Surfaces.

Brasil. (2019). Agência Nacional de Vigilância Sanitária [Anvisa]. Resolução Diretoria Colegiada – RDC no 272, de 14 de março de 2019. Estabelece os aditivos alimentares autorizados para uso em carnes e produtos cárneos. https://www.in.gov.br/web/guest/materia/-/asset_publisher/Kujrw0TZC2Mb/content/id/67378977/do1-2019-03-18-resolucao-da-diretoria-colegiada-rdc-n-272-de-14-de-marco-de-2019-67378770

Brasil. (2022a). Ministério da Saúde [MS], Agência Nacional de Vigilância Sanitária [Anvisa]. Instrução Normativa – IN No 161, de 1o de julho de 2022. Estabelece os padrões microbiológicos dos alimentos. Diário Oficial Da União Edição 126, Seção 1, Página 235.

Brasil. (2022b). Ministério da Saúde [MS], Agência Nacional de Vigilância Sanitária [Anvisa]. Resolução – RDC No 724, de 1º de julho de 2022. Dispõe sobre os padrões microbiológicos dos alimentos e sua aplicação. Diário Oficial Da União Edição 126, Seção 1, Página 205.

Bruns, R. E., Scarminio, I. S., & Neto, B. B. (2005). Statistical Design – Chemometrics, Volume 25, Data Handling in Science and Technology.

Cluff, M., Steyn, H., Charimba, G., Bothma, C., Hugo, C. J., & Hugo, A. (2016). The chemical, microbial, sensory and technological effects of intermediate salt levels as a sodium reduction strategy in fresh pork sausages. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 96(12), 4048-4055. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.7602

Delgado-Pando, G., Fischer, E., Allen, P., Kerry, J. P., O’Sullivan, M. G., & Hamill, R. M. (2018). Salt content and minimum acceptable levels in whole-muscle cured meat products. Meat Science, 139, 179-186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2018.01.025

Di Domenico, J., Machado-Lunkes, A., Prado, N. V., Weber, C. I., & Lucchetta, L. (2020). Reduction of sodium content in pork coppa: Physicochemical, microbiological and sensory evaluation. Scientia Agricola, 78(6). https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-992x-2020-0153

Domínguez, R., Munekata, P. E., Cittadini, A., & Lorenzo, J. M. (2016). Effect of the partial NaCl substitution by other chloride salts on the volatile profile during the ripening of dry-cured lacón. Grasas y Aceites, 67(2), e128. https://doi.org/10.3989/gya.0505152

Dutcosky, S. D. (2019). Análise Sensorial de Alimentos. (5a ed.).Champagnat: Pucpress.

Ferreira, P. C., Abreu Tonani, K. A., Julião, F. C., Cupo, P., Domingo, J. L., & Segura-Muñoz, S. I. (2009). Aluminum Concentrations in Water of Elderly People’s Houses and Retirement Homes and Its Relation with Elderly Health. Bulletin of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology, 83(4), 565-569. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00128-009-9791-8

Fieira, C., Marchi, J. F., Marafão, D., & Trindade Alfaro, A. (2018). The impact of the partial replacement of sodium chloride in the development of starter cultures during Italian salami production. Brazilian Journal of Food Technology, 21. https://doi.org/10.1590/1981-6723.03615

Gan, X., Li, H., Wang, Z., Emara, A. M., Zhang, D., & He, Z. (2019). Does protein oxidation affect proteolysis in low sodium Chinese traditional bacon processing? Meat Science, 150, 14-22. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.MEATSCI.2018.10.007

Gaudette, N. J., & Pietrasik, Z. (2017). The sensory impact of salt replacers and flavor enhancer in reduced sodium processed meats is matrix dependent. Journal of Sensory Studies, 32(1), e12247. https://doi.org/10.1111/joss.12247

Haddad, G. B. S., Moura, A. P. R., Fontes, P. R., Cunha, S. F. V., Ramos, A. L. S., & Ramos, E. M. (2018). The effects of sodium chloride and PSE meat on restructured cured-smoked pork loin quality: A response surface methodology study. Meat Science, 137, 191-200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2017.11.030

Iamarino, L. Z., Oliveira, M. C., Antunes, M. M., Oliveira, M., Rodrigues, R. O., Zanin, C. I. C. B., Schimile, M., & Lima, A. A. L. (2015). Nitrito e nitratos em produtos cárneos enlatados e/ou embutidos. Gestão Em Foco, 246-251.

Inguglia, E. S., Zhang, Z., Tiwari, B. K., Kerry, J. P., & Burgess, C. M. (2017). Salt reduction strategies in processed meat products – A review. Trends in Food Science and Technology, 59, 70-78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2016.10.016

Instituto Brasileiro de Defesa do Consumidor [IDEC]. (2014). Redução de sódio em alimentos: Uma análise dos acordos voluntários no Brasil. https://idec.org.br/publicacao/reducao-de-sodio-em-alimentos-uma-analise-dos-acordos-voluntarios-no-brasil

Koç, Ş., & Baysal, S. S. (2019). Salt, Hypertension, and the Lens. Metabolic Syndrome and Related Disorders, 17(3), 173-181. https://doi.org/10.1089/met.2018.0117

Koniecko, E. S. (1985). Handbook of meat analysis. 289.

Li, F., Zhuang, H., Qiao, W., Zhang, J., & Wang, Y. (2016). Effect of partial substitution of NaCl by KCl on physicochemical properties, biogenic amines and N-nitrosamines during ripening and storage of dry-cured bacon. Journal of Food Science and Technology, 53(10), 3795-3805. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13197-016-2366-x

Nilson, E. A. F., Spaniol, A. M., Gonçalves, V. S. S., Moura, I., Silva, S. A., L’Abbé, M., & Jaime, P. C. (2017). Sodium Reduction in Processed Foods in Brazil: Analysis of Food Categories and Voluntary Targets from 2011 to 2017. Nutrients, 9(7). https://doi.org/10.3390/NU9070742

O’ Neill, C. M., Cruz-Romero, M. C., Duffy, G., & Kerry, J. P. (2018). Shelf life extension of vacuum-packed salt reduced frankfurters and cooked ham through the combined application of high pressure processing and organic acids. Food Packaging and Shelf Life, 17, 120-128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fpsl.2018.06.008

Pan American Health Organization [PAHO]. (2015). Regional Targets on Salt Reduction. https://www3.paho.org/hq/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=10399:regional-targets-salt-reduction&Itemid=41253&lang=en

Pretorius, B., & Schönfeldt, H. C. (2018). The contribution of processed pork meat products to total salt intake in the diet. Food Chemistry, 238, 139-145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2016.11.078

Price, J. F., Schweigert, B. S., & Fuente, J. L. (1994). Ciencia de la carne y de los productos cárnicos.

Stanley, R. E., Bower, C. G., & Sullivan, G. A. (2017). Influence of sodium chloride reduction and replacement with potassium chloride based salts on the sensory and physico-chemical characteristics of pork sausage patties. Meat Science, 133, 36-42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2017.05.021

Taddei, R., Giacometti, F., Bardasi, L., Bonilauri, P., Ramini, M., Fontana, M. C., Bassi, P., Castagnini, S., Ceredi, F., Pelliconi, M. F., Serraino, A., Tomasell, F., Piva, S., Mondo, E., & Merialdi, G. (2020). Effect of production process and high-pressure processing on viability of Listeria innocua in traditional Italian dry-cured coppa. Italian Journal of Food Safety, 9(2), 104-109. https://doi.org/10.4081/IJFS.2020.9133

Tejada, L., Buendía-Moreno, L., Álvarez, E., Palma, A., Salazar, E., Muñoz, B., & Abellán, A. (2021). Development of an Iberian Chorizo Salted With a Combination of Mineral Salts (Seawater Substitute) and Better Nutritional Profile. Frontiers in Nutrition, 8. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnut.2021.642726

Toldrá, F. (2007). Sodium reduction in foods: A necessity for a growing sector of the population. Trends in Food Science & Technology, 18(11), 583. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.TIFS.2007.07.005

Triki, M., Khemakhem, I., Trigui, I., Ben Salah, R., Jaballi, S., Ruiz-Capillas, C., Ayadi, M. A., Attia, H., & Besbes, S. (2017). Free-sodium salts mixture and AlgySalt® use as NaCl substitutes in fresh and cooked meat products intended for the hypertensive population. Meat Science, 133, 194-203. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.MEATSCI.2017.07.005

Vanderzant, C., Splittstoesser, D. F., & APHA, A. P. H. A. (1992). Compendium of methods for the microbiological examination of foods. (3ª ed.). American Public Health Association.

Vignoto, V. K. C., Carmo, L. G., & Wosiacki, S. R. (2010). Efeito da maturação da carne na qualidade sanitária do jerked beef. Publicatio UEPG – Ciencias Exatas e Da Terra, Agrarias e Engenharias, 16(2), 89-95. https://doi.org/10.5212/publ.exatas.v.16i2.0004

Wong, K. M., Corradini, M. G., Autio, W., & Kinchla, A. J. (2019). Sodium reduction strategies through use of meat extenders (white button mushrooms vs. Textured soy) in beef patties. Food Science & Nutrition, 7(2), 506-518. https://doi.org/10.1002/FSN3.824

World Health Organization [WHO]. (2016). Salt reduction – Fact sheet. http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs393/en/

Wu, H., Zhuang, H., Zhang, Y., Tang, J., Yu, X., Long, M., Wang, J., & Zhang, J. (2015). Influence of partial replacement of NaCl with KCl on profiles of volatile compounds in dry-cured bacon during processing. Food Chemistry, 172, 391-399. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2014.09.088

Yotsuyanagi, S. E., Contreras-Castillo, C. J., Haguiwara, M. M. H., Cipolli, K. M. V. A. B., Lemos, A. L. S. C., Morgano, M. A., & Yamada, E. A. (2016). Technological, sensory and microbiological impacts of sodium reduction in frankfurters. Meat Science, 115, 50-59. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.MEATSCI.2015.12.016

Supplementary data 1. ANOVA models for proximal composition, pH, Aw, nitrate and nitrite concentration during the storage period of reduced sodium pork coppa.

Parameter

Time (days)

Equation

R2adj (%)

p

Lack of fit (p)

Moisture

0

ymoisture0 = 42.11 x1 + 38.46x2 – 8.14x1x2

41.53

0.27

0.00

45

ymoisture45 = 40.76x1 + 41.21x2 – 16.49x1x2

87.72

0.12

0.00

90

ymoisture90 = 39.90x1 + 39.06x2 –18.12x1x2

15.00

0.05

0.00

105

ymoisture105 = 33.78x1 + 38.10x2 – 16.16x1x2

94.93

0.84

0.00

Protein

0

yprotein= 35.74x1 + 33.29x2 + 0.14x1x2

16.27

0.83

0.00

Fat

yfat = 10.19x1 + 18.22x2 + 12.46x1x2

95.14

0.04

0.00

Nitrate

ynitrate = 6.47x1 + 8.87x2 + 47.22x1x2

42.31

0.57

0.00

Nitrite

ynitrite = 10.45x1 + 11.53x2 – 13.28x1x2

57.52

0.42

0.00

Aw

0

yaw0 = 0.83x1 + 0.86x2 – 0.02x1x2

79.58

0.65

0.00

45

yaw45 = 0.84x1 + 0.86x2 – 0.13 x1x2

67.22

0.33

0.00

90

yaw90 = 0.84x1 + 0.84x2 – 0.16x1x2

79.58

0.20

0.00

105

yaw105 = 0.83x1 + 0.83x2 – 0.01x1x2

69.40

0.30

0.00

pH

0

ypH0 = 5.79x1 + 5.63x2 + 0.39x1x2

45.62

0.54

0.00

45

pH45 = 6.15x1 + 5.88x2 + 0.25x1x2

57.81

0.42

0.00

90

ypH90 = 6.34x1 + 6.18 x2 – 0.56x1x2

98.14

0.02

0.00

105

ypH105 = 6.37x1 + 5.91x2 – 0.84 x1x2

52.53

0.47

0.00

x1: NaCl; x2:KCl; R2adj: Adjusted R Squared, p: (p < 0.05); Lack of fit (p): (p < 0.05)

Supplementary data 2. ANOVA models for texture profile of reduced sodium pork coppa at 0, 45, 90 and 105 days of storage period.

Parameter

Time (days)

Equation

R2adj (%)

p

Lack of Fit (p)

Hardness

0

y hardness0 = 8484x1 + 8640x2 – 1658x1x2

22.94

0.77

0.00

45

Yhardness45 = 6912x1 + 6357x2 + 2693x1x2

14.78

0.85

0.00

90

Yhardness90 = 7543x1+ 7307x2 + 5939x1x2

97.89

0.02

0.00

105

Yhardness105 = 3109x1 + 3971x2 + 4435x1x2

55.84

0.44

0.00

Cohesiveness

0

Ycohesiveness0 = 0.57x1 + 0.56x2 – 0.02x1x2

18.50

0.98

0.00

45

ycohesiveness45 = 0.60x1 + 0.53x2 – 0.00x1x2

85.58

0.14

0.00

90

ycohesiveness90 = 0.60x1 + 0.63x2 – 0.07x1x2

26.50

0.73

0.00

105

ycohesiveness105 = 0.53x1 + 0.59x2 – 0.03x1x2

72.74

0.27

0.00

Chewiness

0

Ychewiness0 = 3623x1 + 3573x2 + 394x1x2

19.50

0.98

0.00

45

Ychewiness45 = 3373x1 + 2025x2 + 1642x1x2

50.62

0.49

0.00

90

Ychewiness90 = 3661x1 + 3672x2 + 877x1x2

34.12

0.66

0.00

105

Ychewiness105 = 1058x1 + 1661x2 + 904x1x2

65.15

0.35

0.00

Elasticity

0

yelasticity0 = 0.73x1 + 074x2 – 0.13x1x2

50.83

0.50

0.00

45

yelasticity45 = 0.79x1 + 0.66x2 + 0.13x1x2

72.84

0.27

0.00

90

yelasticity90 = 0.80x1 + 0.79x2 – 0.23x1x2

44.23

0.55

0.00

105

yelasticity105 = 0.66x1 + 0.71x2 – 0.19 x1x2

68.98

0.31

0.00

x1: NaCl; x2:KCl; R2adj: Adjusted R Squared, p: (p < 0.05); Lack of fit (p): (p < 0.05)

Supplementary data 3. ANOVA models for sensory parametrs of reduced sodium pork coppa at 0, 45, 90 days of storage period.

time

(days)

equation

R2adj (%)

p

Lack of Fit (p)

0

ycolor0 = 7.39x1 + 7.27x2 + 0.22x1x2

16.37

0.84

0. 00

Yflavor0 = 6.95x1 + 7.23x2

37.52

0.27

0.97

ytexture0 = 7.13x1 + 6.97x2 + 0.19x1x2

95.00

0.91

0.00

yoverall impression0 = 6.99x1 + 7.3x2

20.68

0.44

0.96

45

ycolor45 = 7.28x1 + 7.40x2 + 0.21x1x2

15.73

0.00

0.59

Yflavor45 = 7.34x1 + 7.02x2

23.85

0.41

0.87

ytexture45 = 7.25x1 + 7.28x2 – 0.014 x1x2

38.30

0.96

0.00

Yoverall impression45 = 7.06x1 + 7.07x2 – 0.019x1x2

51.60

0.72

0.00

90

Ycolor90 = 7.6x1 + 7.38x2 + 0.55x1x2

75.63

0.13

0.00

Yflavor90 = 7.06x1 + 7.17x2

12.06

0.57

0.94

Ytexture90 = 7.06x1 + 7.22x2

54.04

0.09

0.39

Yoverral impression90 = 7.01x1 + 7.12x2 + 0.42x1x2

49.84

0.50

0.00

x1: NaCl; x2:KCl; R2adj: Adjusted R Squared, p: (p< 0.05); Lack of fit (p): (p < 0.05)